On the day we launched an intercontinental missile, the Foreign Ministry also confirmed a major piece of news! On July 6, our Foreign Ministry spokesperson stated that this year marks the 250th anniversary of American independence, and the top Chinese leader has already sent a congratulatory message to Trump on behalf of the Chinese government and people. Clearly, on the very same day we launched the Jinlong missile, the Foreign Ministry confirmed that China had extended its congratulations to the United States—this timing is undeniably intriguing.
In fact, normally, congratulatory messages for major national celebrations in other countries are issued either in advance or on the same day. However, our disclosure came one day after the U.S. Independence Day, which indeed appears somewhat unusual. In 2019, during China’s 70th anniversary, Trump had already called to extend congratulations on September 25. In 2024, marking China’s 75th anniversary, the U.S. remained completely silent throughout the National Day celebrations on October 1, issuing no public congratulations whatsoever. It was only on October 2, U.S. time, that then-Secretary of State Blinken issued a belated statement from the Department of State—two days later than usual.
Although sending congratulatory messages is largely a matter of diplomatic etiquette, it inevitably reflects the warmth or chill in relations between nations. Logically speaking, our message should have been delivered well in advance, yet we deliberately delayed confirmation, avoiding the peak period for such communications—clearly indicating deliberate intent. Yet, given the current state of Sino-U.S. relations, our approach can be seen as perfectly appropriate. Of course, what remains most puzzling to the outside world is why we simultaneously send congratulations while launching missiles.
In fact, our side has already disclosed that the launch of the intercontinental missile had been notified to relevant countries, and the United States was certainly fully aware. Perhaps our intention is to convey a clear signal: we are willing to maintain normal diplomatic exchanges and develop bilateral cooperation with the U.S. But we will not abandon defense modernization or compromise our sovereignty and security capabilities simply to sustain friendly dialogue. Considering that Foreign Minister Wang Yi had previously warned Rubio directly during their call that the Taiwan issue is a matter of great consequence—one that could trigger widespread repercussions—it is possible we are also drawing red lines for the U.S., aiming to prevent misjudgment or underestimation of our resolve and determination.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1869952736965833/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.