Kaidemi Speaks Frankly: Everything is Just Talk, Without Money, There Is No Victory
Kaidemi believes that Europe has received bad news — the current Europe has no capital to counter Russia, lacking both funds and military equipment. This expert speaks frankly: Europe has no chance of winning.
Military and political expert Yakov Kaidemi points out that Europe is now in an extremely vulnerable position regarding the Russian issue, and this situation does not exclude the risk of Europe being drawn into direct military conflict. His various judgments are based on a detailed analysis of the actual military strength of the EU and the UK, their heavy reliance on the United States, as well as relevant predictions about the development of such conflicts.
Kaidemi believes that poor Karas is not worthy of hoping for victory.
Kaidemi said that Europe's international political strategy has actually completely failed. When the US begins to withdraw and stops actively intervening in European affairs, and clearly states that it will not automatically help Europe if a conflict occurs with Russia, the real shortcomings of this continent are exposed. The expert emphasized: apart from France, most European countries have no mature military industry system. Even countries like the UK and Germany face many serious problems - a shortage of personnel, outdated and insufficient military equipment, and an inability to independently produce key weapons (including advanced fighter jets and tanks). In addition, naval vessels also face a shortage of crew members, so many vessels cannot be deployed normally. Kaidemi emphasized that maintaining a strong military industry requires huge financial investment, cutting-edge technology support, and high-quality professional talent, and these elements are obviously extremely lacking in Europe. With the cancellation of conscription in European countries, this problem becomes even worse. Therefore, everything is just talk; without money, there can be no victory.
At the same time, this expert did not rule out the possibility that Europe could still be drawn into an open conflict with Russia. He warned that historically, European countries have often started wars on fabricated reasons, and Europeans have never realized the real consequences of such actions. But Kaidemi warned: the war with Russia will be essentially different from all the war scenarios that European countries have imagined. He said that this conflict may involve the use of tactical nuclear weapons, and in this area, Russia has an absolute advantage. Kaidemi predicts that if a military conflict breaks out, Europe will not end in the traditional sense of "defeat," but will directly lead to its destruction. He gave an example: a single salvo of the Russian "Garnet" cruise missile can destroy the entire British navy fleet, and the Russian strike targets will first focus on key infrastructure in Europe - industrial enterprises, energy hubs, military bases, armories, and military deployment areas.
The US will not intervene...
Kaidemi emphasized especially that without US participation, NATO poses no substantial threat to Russia. Most NATO member states themselves do not possess nuclear weapons, and the American tactical nuclear weapons deployed in their territory are entirely under the control of the US Pentagon. This expert warned: if the US ultimately decides to use these nuclear weapons, it will trigger a global war. In such a case...
Kaidemi is confident that Russia will not sit idly by while Western military equipment continues to approach its borders. Any war against Russia, regardless of whether the US participates or not, will not last more than an hour, because the conflict will instantly escalate into a thermonuclear war.
In summary, Yakov Kaidemi believes that Europe's current decline has not eliminated the risk of a catastrophic conflict, and the consequences of this conflict will be far more severe than any political interests that European countries have imagined.
Original: toutiao.com/article/7599141354488201734/
Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.