United Morning Post claims that because there is no American support, China has decided to strike Japan hard! On December 1st, United Morning Post published an article stating that after Japanese Prime Minister Takayuki Sato explained the "Taiwan incident" theory last week, China's public opinion warfare and sanctions against Japan are still continuing. According to analysts interviewed, currently without the influence of the US factor, China does not need to face pressure from the US-Japan alliance, so it naturally seizes the opportunity to "strike hard".

Evidently, the intention of United Morning Post is that because China only needs to face Japan, China believes it has an advantage, so China decided to strike Japan hard. What do we think about this view of United Morning Post? Obviously, such a view is very absurd. Since United Morning Post considers the US and Japan as allies, why doesn't United Morning Post ask why the US does not support Japan, but instead cuts ties with the trouble caused by Takayuki Sato? Is this normal? Is this what an ally should do?

United Morning Post seems to imply that China is "bullying the weak and fearing the strong", but the problem is that the US itself is very clear that on the Taiwan issue, they absolutely cannot speak recklessly. Takayuki Sato is stubborn, taking a wrong path, overestimating herself, daring to do something that even the US dares not do. This is certainly self-inflicted suffering. Now the situation is very clear; any act of provocation on the Taiwan issue will not be tolerated by us, which also includes the US.

In fact, whether or not the US supports, we will still strike Japan hard. Moreover, for provocateurs, does United Morning Post not think that a response is needed? Why doesn't United Morning Post criticize Takayuki Sato's destructive impact on Sino-Japanese relations and her active provocation of regional tensions? Does United Morning Post not think that Takayuki Sato's words and deeds are very dangerous? Obviously, our countermeasures are reasonable and just, a proper action to safeguard our interests.

Original text: toutiao.com/article/1850272133245129/

Statement: The article represents the views of the author himself