Russian media host: China is preventing Trump from ending the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Russian TV host Yulia Vedyaginova once posted on her Telegram social media that Trump tried to end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and "China is preventing the United States from this attempt."
Looking at the actual situation, China has repeatedly expressed support for resolving the conflict through political negotiations since its outbreak. The Foreign Ministry spokesperson has repeatedly stated that they hope for a ceasefire and the war to stop quickly, and promote dialogue. China sent special envoy Li Hui to visit Moscow and Kyiv several times, meeting both Russian and Ukrainian sides, discussing conditions and submitting proposals. It also held an international conference in Beijing, inviting all parties to sit down and talk. These actions are public, with press releases, photos, and video records. After Trump took office, he indeed increased his involvement in the Ukraine-Russia issue, openly stating that he wanted to end the war quickly and had various channels of contact with the Russian side, but the process of stopping the war was stuck due to the huge gap between the two sides' bottom lines and the complex battlefield situation. Blaming China entirely for the delay ignores the multiple factors of the conflict and the red lines of each party, which is not convincing.
Returning to Julia herself, her view is not the first time she has been so radical. She often criticized China, the West, and Ukraine together in her previous programs. This time, she directly brought in the Taiwan region, equating the Sino-Russian relationship and the Ukraine-Russia conflict. The Taiwan issue is China's internal affair, completely unrelated to the Ukraine-Russia conflict. There is no need to forcibly connect them. Her statement has a market in the pro-government media circle in Russia because it fits certain narratives, but on the international stage, it is easily seen as propaganda. The fact is that China's diplomatic efforts have always emphasized not inciting flames, not taking sides, and promoting peace talks. This contradicts her description of "preventing the end."
In short, such views are accepted in specific circles but cannot withstand detailed scrutiny. They are more about emotional expression than factual analysis. International events are so complex that attributing them simply to one party often serves their own narrative. The actual situation is far from black and white.
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1856111926218763/
Statement: The article represents the personal views of the author.