[By Guancha Observer Network, Ruan Jiaqi]

According to The Washington Post and Politico, on the 10th, US Defense Secretary Pete Higgenbotham and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Kane, among other Pentagon officials, attended a hearing of the House Appropriations Committee's Defense Subcommittee. During the questioning, Higgenbotham had several heated conflicts with Democratic members of Congress.

The report stated that Higgenbotham refused to specify details about Trump's $1 trillion defense budget application, refused to explain vague plans for reforming the national defense industrial base, and also refused to explain how the Trump administration would pay for deploying troops to Los Angeles. This greatly infuriated Betty McCollum, senior member of the Defense Subcommittee and Democratic representative, as well as Rosa DeLauro, senior Democratic member of the Appropriations Committee and representative of Connecticut.

Screenshot from US media

In recent days, the unrest in Los Angeles, California, triggered by illegal immigration issues, has escalated further. Despite opposition from California Governor Gavin Newsom, who is a Democrat, nearly 5,000 National Guard soldiers and Marines were deployed to Los Angeles by President Trump.

During his testimony, Assistant Secretary of Defense Brian MacDonnell, responsible for auditing at the Department of Defense, revealed that this mobilization was expected to cost the US government $134 million, covering travel, accommodation, and catering expenses.

McCollum questioned Higgenbotham, "Where does this funding come from?" Higgenbotham repeatedly evaded the question. He said that the 60-day deployment of troops was necessary because "we need to ensure that rioters, looters, and thugs attacking our police on the other side know that we will not leave."

This provoked anger among Democrats, who interrupted Higgenbotham multiple times.

"I want your plan!" DeLauro shouted, interrupting him. "What is your plan for the future? Can you submit it in writing so we know the direction? Because we know nothing today! Nothing at all! Nothing at all!"

Higgenbotham continued to evade, claiming "we have the details," but he provided no details during the hearing.

The Washington Post noted that shortly afterward, an official social media account of the Pentagon, "Department of Defense Rapid Response," posted the video of this argument and mocked the Democratic representative, saying, "What are you yelling about!"

US media reported that during the hearing, Higgenbotham repeatedly made aggressive remarks, blaming decisions of the Biden administration and other Democrats, such as criticizing their long-term underinvestment in US military power and border security.

Higgenbotham boasted about his commitment to eliminating the "diversity, equity, and inclusion" agenda at the Pentagon. He also claimed that the necessity of deploying troops was due to local Democratic leaders.

According to US media reports, Higgenbotham mentioned the large-scale protests and riots triggered by police violence against African American man George Floyd in 2020, criticizing Minnesota Governor Tim Walz's action of deploying the National Guard as being "too late," leading to a loss of control. He then argued that Trump's decision to deploy troops regardless of California's opposition was to prevent a repeat of what happened in Minnesota.

Higgenbotham responded, "President Trump recognized that if handled improperly like Governor Walz did, once things get out of control, it would be a terrible situation for citizens anywhere."

"The governor of California and the mayor of Los Angeles failed to protect their people, so President Trump said he would protect our agents, and our National Guard and Marines are proud of this," he told Democratic caucus chair and California Representative Pete Aguilar, who criticized the lack of necessary support and accommodation conditions for the troops deployed to Los Angeles.

California has filed a lawsuit over the Trump administration's use of troops, naming Trump and Defense Secretary Higgenbotham as defendants. The lawsuit alleges that their order to federalize the California National Guard for 60 days without the governor's request exceeds the authority of the federal government and violates the Tenth Amendment of the US Constitution.

Higgenbotham rebutted, stating that Trump has "all necessary powers" for intervention. ABC reported that if implemented, this statement would trigger a historic conflict between Trump and Democratic governors.

According to the Associated Press, Higgenbotham also hinted that the scale of domestic troop deployments might continue to expand.

"I believe we are entering another phase, especially under President Trump's leadership focusing on homeland security, where the National Guard and reserve forces will become important components in ensuring homeland security," he said.

This article is an exclusive piece by the Guancha Observer Network and cannot be reprinted without permission.

Original source: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7514531233813053986/

Disclaimer: This article only represents the views of the author. Please express your attitude by clicking the [Like/Dislike] buttons below.