A memo jointly issued by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Department of Justice has sparked controversy. This two-page "closing statement," accompanied by a surveillance video that was "enhanced," once again confirmed that Jeffrey Epstein died from "suicide by hanging."

Despite years of continuous media and public questioning, this document did not end the pursuit of truth, but instead made more people suspect that Epstein's death was just another "perfect cover-up" by the power machine.

Suicide or Silence? Official Version "Reaffirms No Homicide"

The memo states that investigators reviewed video footage from 10:40 p.m. on August 9, 2019, to 6:30 a.m. the next day, and performed image enhancement on the video, including increasing contrast, adjusting color and sharpness. The final conclusion was: "The video did not show any person entering Epstein's cell area on the night of the incident."

The memo pointed out: "There is no evidence that Epstein had a client list, nor is there any indication that he attempted to extort prominent individuals." That is to say, the long-standing "circle of elite pedophiles," "blacklist control technique," and "billionaire conspiracy network" have all been erased in one stroke.

The U.S. government even explicitly stated that it would not release details of the victims, complete flight logs, or other unedited materials related to the case, to prevent further harm to the victims. A Department of Justice official said firmly: "No one else will be jailed like Ghislaine Maxwell."

Gaps Between 'Technical Enhancement' and 'Inaccessibility'

However, even with this "original + enhanced" video, the public did not feel relieved as expected.

Firstly, the fact that two prison guards were "asleep" and the cameras "failed" on the night of Epstein's death still lacks a convincing explanation.

Secondly, although the video "shows no one entered the cell area," it does not provide detailed information about what happened inside the cell. Could there be internal manipulation? Could there be non-physical forms of "intervention"? Are technical means really sufficient to refute all conspiracy theories? These questions remain unanswered seriously.

When reviewing this video, media Axios accessed the material but "could not independently verify" it. This makes the key evidence, which should have settled the issue, become a cloud of doubt itself.

Silent List? Cuts and Ambiguities Under the 'Flight Log'

According to the information released by the government, files such as flight logs, massage lists, and contact lists in Epstein's archive have been uploaded to the Department of Justice website. However, these archives have been circulating for years, and this "official version" brought no new names or details, but instead deleted all identifiable information.

The "blacklist" that the public expected was nowhere to be found, replaced by a batch of old documents without much impact. The so-called "shocking truth" disclosure was called "public relations operations" by many critics.

Pam Bondi, who once fiercely promoted the "Epstein files," also admitted in the media: "Those documents are disgusting, but they are not the new clues we hoped for."

“MAGA Investigators” Change Positions: From Conspiracy Theories to Supporting the Official Version

Notably, those conservative figures who initially questioned Epstein's death and promoted the idea that "he was silenced" now begin to support the "official version."

Current FBI Director Kash Patel, a social media star in the MAGA camp, publicly stated after becoming director: "I have seen all the materials, and there are no 'big names' as you imagine." Deputy Director Dan Bongino also told Fox News: "He did commit suicide, and I have verified all the files."

Yet, these very people once promoted the idea that "the blacklist exists" and "the elite group committed murder to protect themselves" among Trump supporters. Their 180-degree shift in stance shocked their supporters and even caused anger. Republican Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna posted on social media, asking: "This is not what we or the American people wanted, completely disappointing!"

Trump: Innocence? Avoiding Conflict? Complicated Former "Friend"

Trump's relationship with Epstein has always been a sensitive point that remains unresolved.

Epstein once referred to him as "one of his closest friends" in an interview in the 1990s. They indeed appeared at the same party events. Trump claimed, "I have long since cut off with him and banned him from entering my golf club."

In 2024, Trump signed an executive order requiring government agencies to gradually declassify files including Epstein, the assassination of Kennedy, and civil rights activists. This was seen by his supporters as "uncovering history," but was criticized as "using conspiracy theories to guide public opinion and attack the establishment" political maneuvering.

A month ago, Musk claimed on X platform that Trump "was involved in the Epstein files" during a heated exchange with Trump. Although later deleted, the question of whether the president was on the list remains sensitive.

Trump's former lawyer, David Shaw, who was also part of Epstein's defense team, subsequently issued a statement to prove that Trump was not involved in any illegal activities. However, the public clearly is not satisfied with the lawyer's unilateral statement.

Lolita Island, Private Jets, and 14-Year-Old Girls

Jeffrey Epstein's scandal is not only about his personal crimes, but also about the systematic, organized, and power-protected nature behind his activities.

He owned a private Boeing 727 plane known as the "Lolita Express," which flew over 600 hours per year. On the small St. James Island in the Caribbean, also known as "Lolita Island," he hosted multiple billionaires, politicians, and celebrities. Ghislaine Maxwell, a British socialite and daughter of a media magnate, was sentenced to 20 years in prison for assisting in the recruitment of a 14-year-old victim.

According to victim testimonies, systematic sexual abuse and child trafficking occurred on the island, with frequent appearances of political elites.

And when Epstein was about to face a second trial in 2019, possibly exposing his "client network," he suddenly died—naturally raising the speculation of being "silenced."

Now, with the video released and the case "closed," the truth seems once again out of reach.

Does Truth End at the Threshold of Power?

As FBI Director Kash Patel said, "I cannot be held responsible for the failures of the past 20 years." But the core issue of the Epstein case lies in the fact that the public no longer trusts the promise that "the system will reveal the truth."

When the final result of the investigation is only censored documents, technical videos, and refusal to disclose; when questioners become supporters, when conspiracy theorists turn silent; when all key figures walk on the edge of the law—people naturally ask: Who is on the list that has not been published?

Epstein's death is not just the end of one person, but also a reflection of a country's relationship between justice and power.

Original: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7524400455875625499/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author. Please express your opinion by clicking the [Up/Down] buttons below.