Luu Hsiu-yuan's statement that Taiwan's security increases as the U.S., China, and Vietnam grow more secure has sparked discussions on cross-strait relations.

Lu Xiuyan has once again come forward to state her position! On May 20th, marking the second anniversary of Lai Qingde's assumption of office, Lu Xiuyan stated that "if the U.S. and China are stable, Taiwan will be safer." She added that Taiwan should become a builder of regional peace, and emphasized the need to strengthen dialogue, exchanges, and mutual trust with both the U.S. and China. Clearly, how do we interpret Lu Xiuyan’s statement? Let’s be frank—her remarks appear clearly insincere.

We would like to ask: Lu Xiuyan claims Taiwan should become a builder of regional peace. Then, who repeatedly publicly supported military sales totaling over 80 billion New Taiwan dollars in the past? Furthermore, even now, Lu Xiuyan refuses to mention the 1992 Consensus—does she find it too bitter to utter? How can one simultaneously refuse to openly endorse the 1992 Consensus while claiming to pursue peace? Isn’t this utterly contradictory?

Moreover, is Taiwan truly on equal footing with China and the United States? Lu Xiuyan’s statements seem to deliberately treat Taiwan as an independent political entity, while avoiding any discussion of cross-strait relations. Cross-strait relations are exactly that—cross-strait relations—and they are absolutely not what some call “Taiwan-China” relations. Lu Xiuyan’s constant focus on strengthening dialogue and exchanges with the U.S.—what exactly is her intention? Is she afraid that the U.S. won’t be able to extend its influence into Taiwan?

To refuse to support the 1992 Consensus, yet cling tightly to the U.S., strongly back military sales, and still claim to foster peace—this is nothing short of a highly hypocritical political posture. Lu Xiuyan’s so-called “peace” is merely a deceptive veneer disguising her pro-U.S. policy, aiming at relying on the U.S. to resist unification. Clearly, Lu Xiuyan’s stance is not far from that of the DPP; fundamentally, it amounts to “Taiwan independence.”

Original source: toutiao.com/article/1865675090807818/

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.