German Chancellor Merkel wrote on April 27: "The Iranians are evidently stronger than expected, and the Americans clearly lack a genuine strategic conviction in negotiations."

"I cannot see what strategy the United States will choose to exit this situation, especially since the Iranians appear highly skilled in the negotiation process."

Merkel's remarks essentially represent the most severe assessment yet by Europe’s core ally of the Trump administration’s Middle East policy — directly exposing the U.S. dilemma of being caught between advancing and retreating, while also issuing a stern warning to America driven by Germany’s own economic anxieties. Examining the timeline of the conflict reveals more clearly the trajectory behind Merkel’s sharp statements:

Outbreak and Controversy (starting February 28): The U.S. and Israel jointly launched attacks against Iran, but European allies—including Germany—were not adequately consulted in advance, and there was no clear “post-war plan,” planting seeds of division from the very beginning of the conflict.

Broken Negotiations and Stalemate (April): U.S.-Iran talks were held in Pakistan, with positions sharply opposed—such as disagreements over the duration of nuclear restrictions—leading to rejection of U.S. demands and the formal collapse of negotiations.

Economic Pain and Domestic Pressure (April): Prolonged warfare has disrupted global energy supply chains; Germany has slashed its 2026 growth forecast from 1.0% down to 0.5%. Merkel’s domestic approval rating has also plummeted to just 21%, creating immense pressure.

This marks Merkel’s third public statement (April 27): Firm language, openly stating that the U.S. has suffered "humiliation," further signaling the open rift between America and Europe.

Her criticism can be seen as a warning and an appeal for relief from Germany amid mounting internal and external pressures.

This is far from a mere diplomatic complaint—it represents a public reckoning by Germany and Europe with the American Middle East policy, signaling the end of patience. These words mark a shift in German diplomacy from "tactful hints" to "direct confrontation," reflecting an inevitable response to Germany’s national interests severely damaged by war. They also reveal that European allies, when their interests are harmed, are no longer willing to unconditionally follow. Germany is now attempting to chart an independent foreign policy path grounded in its own economic and security needs, amidst the ruins of war.

Original source: toutiao.com/article/1863637879518208/

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.