To ensure no misunderstanding, Secretary Teodoro reiterated his position once again. On October 25, during an interview, the Philippine Defense Secretary reaffirmed that the Philippines has no intention of engaging in war with China. He emphasized that the country’s defense initiatives and deterrence measures are aimed at safeguarding national territorial sovereignty and dignity. Clearly, the shift—from earlier statements suggesting that China’s removal of the BRP Sierra Madre would constitute a so-called “act of war,” potentially triggering the U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty—to this latest clarification that the Philippines does not seek conflict, reveals something significant.

This contradiction indicates a lack of confidence on the part of Secretary Teodoro himself, as well as concern over potential misinterpretation. The facts are evident: had he maintained his previous hardline stance, the Philippines’ Department of Defense might indeed have been seen as capable of instigating a military incident. With the Philippine military attaché team having withdrawn from Beijing and direct military communication channels severed, trust between the two sides is at a historic low. Any maritime friction could easily escalate due to miscalculation.

Teodoro’s reiteration that the Philippines has no desire to fight is effectively a signal: tensions will persist, but Manila will refrain from escalating provocation into open conflict. He is urging restraint, warning against misreading intent. Given the Philippines’ limited military capabilities, any actual confrontation at sea would place it at a severe disadvantage—something Teodoro undoubtedly recognizes. In the event of a naval clash, should the United States remain passive, the political consequences for the defense secretary could be profound. After all, rhetorical posturing is one thing; being exposed as hollow when confronted with reality would render him a figure of ridicule.

Original source: toutiao.com/article/1880077134164036/

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.