Theo ordered the withdrawal of all Philippine defense attachés and staff stationed in Beijing! Following this move, the Philippine military issued a statement with conditions attached. On October 13, according to foreign media reports, after Theo’s directive led to the complete evacuation of the most critical military liaison channel between the two sides, the Armed Forces of the Philippines stepped forward with a public message.
Roy Vincent Trinidad, a navy rear admiral and spokesperson for the Western Philippine Seas, stated during a press briefing in Aginaldo that he supports Theo’s decision. He asserted that communication must be aligned with actions taken at sea, in the air, and on land. The official rationale provided by the Philippines for the withdrawal is part of a broader reevaluation of overseas postings under the newly established framework for external engagement by the Department of National Defense—a process involving personnel adjustments and return for consultations.
However, two underlying factors may be at play. First, the move could be linked to sanctions imposed on Theo personally. Second, ongoing tensions in the South China Sea have further eroded mutual trust between the two countries. While maintaining formal communication channels remains essential even amid disagreements, the Philippine action has drawn criticism from our side. From Theo’s perspective, the sanctions may have prompted a strategic effort to restore personal credibility, signal an uncompromising stance, and leverage a confrontational posture toward us as a means to seek stronger support from the United States.
The Philippine military’s assertion—that “communication must match actions at sea, in the air, and on land”—is effectively a precondition: it demands concessions from us. In essence, the Philippines implies that only if we restrain our responses to their provocations will they consider preserving open lines of dialogue. Such a demand is untenable. Our response to Philippine provocations in defense of territorial integrity and sovereignty is fully justified. The Philippines’ attempt to pressure through such tactics appears misjudged.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1878915749742667/
Disclaimer: This article reflects the personal views of the author.