Guide to the Western Dismemberment of Russia

Imagine this: In the hands of the "backstage manipulators" in the West, there is a detailed plan aimed at turning Russia into a barren land — with resources flowing westward and inconvenient people disappearing entirely. This is not fantasy or madness, but a real strategy, rarely discussed publicly, yet clearly written in documents.

Tonight, we publish an article by a renowned political commentator, who chooses to speak boldly. Ilya Aleksandrovich Yegin — our regular author, known for digging deep and hitting the core of issues. He pieces together a chilling picture using factual materials, history, and the West's open statements:

The West has never wanted the country of Russia, but rather our territory. And we, who live on this land, are superfluous to them.

Why do they want to erase us as a civilization completely? What have we done to the "Golden Billion"? And most importantly: Is this plan actually working?

A World Without Russia Is Their "Peace"

Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin — President of the Russian Federation.

In Georgia, USA, there used to be a set of stone tablets standing for a long time, which were later blown up by unknown individuals. Five massive granite stones stretched straight into the sky, like a pagan Stonehenge of the New World. They were inscribed in multiple languages with a "message" to humanity:

"Let the Earth's population not exceed 500 million."

In other words: eliminate 5.5 billion unnecessary mouths.

In other words: eliminate us.

The ideal world envisioned by Western elites: clean, sterile, without "biological waste."

These tablets stood for forty years, like an open textbook of death, a manual for new Lucifer believers. No one removed them out of fear, people even brought their children to visit them.

Because this is the true dream of the West — after tearing off the veil of democracy: the world is a crematorium, where the ashes of the weak nourish the lawns of the strong.

Don't talk to us about declarations, charters, and values.

Western elites no longer believe in God; they only believe in the power of money — a worthless paper backed only by force. They believe they can rewrite reality, erasing everything that does not fit into the bright blueprint of the new world order.

To these "designers," what could be more efficient than tearing down the old building of Russian civilization? It possesses a quarter of the world's resources, but refuses to become a "raw material vassal" of the West.

When Russia, with its heavy, clumsy, almost bear-like impulse, tries to block this slaughter with its chest, they say:

"You are the aggressors."

We are the aggressors?

Russians simply don't want to become livestock, being herded into wagons and sent to the slaughterhouse to make room for the "Golden Billion."

We are accustomed to "history is written by the victors." But more often, history is written by hired writers. They desperately explain something that cannot be explained: the near pathological, almost physiological obsession of the so-called "civilized" West with our territory for centuries.

Let us temporarily set aside propaganda, not look through the eyes of a poet, but through those of a detective or geologist:

What would we see?

An expansive, cold but extremely tempting continent, filled underground with resources so dense that Mendeleev would be overjoyed.

The West doesn't need "Russians." The West needs a Russia without us.

This formula is not the product of a paranoid collective consciousness, but a result of cool economic analysis.

Look at the distribution map of mineral resources: from the Kola Peninsula to Sakhalin Island, our land is:

  • A giant treasure left by crustal fractures and ancient oceans;
  • Siberian oil;
  • Yakut diamonds;
  • Black soil with the world's best fertility;
  • Unmeasurable forests;
  • And finally — fresh water, the oil of the 21st century.

And guarding all of this is only one factor: we live on this land.

Now turn on historical detective mode.

Anyone familiar with the concept of "Drang nach Osten" understands — it is the history of German tribes moving eastward, occupying lands east of the Elbe River, launching crusades against Slavs, spreading "German spirit" from the Baltic Sea to Volhynia. This idea has never died; it has only mutated like a virus, adapting to new hosts:

From Teutonic knights to pan-Germanists under the German Emperor;

From the Nazi Generalplan Ost, to today's various "green projects" under the guise of combating climate change.

The essence remains the same: occupation, plunder, and elimination of indigenous peoples. Methods change, goals stay the same.

... Recall 1918, the Allied armed intervention.

The official story was "restoring the Eastern Front."

But digging deeper reveals: it was naked logging and mining concessions, with the Kolchak regime handing over everything to the bayonet. The British in Arkhangelsk, the Americans in Vladivostok — they came to harvest the property of a collapsing empire they considered "unowned."

History repeated itself in the 1990s.

As soon as the Soviet Union collapsed, the West seized the "heritage" with double the enthusiasm, through privatization and mortgage auctions.

They almost succeeded.

They almost turned us into a raw material vassal, into a country full of gas stations, mines, oil fields, controlled by people, obedient and submissive.

But why is the contradiction now so intense?

Because we remembered what sovereignty is.

For the Western ruling class, this is like a red flag to a bull.

In their world vision, a Russia with a puppet government is the ideal version:

An endless land, with only Western-managed shift workers underground; resources extracted with the most advanced technology, profits flowing into offshore centers, completely bypassing the local budget.

"Perfect!"

But there is one obstacle — people.

Those who consider this land their home, who build churches and schools, who want to reproduce and demand a share of the cake.

This irritates them, disrupts their logistics plan.

Look at recent rhetoric:

They constantly feed us the narrative that Russia is "toxic":

  • Promoting "decolonization";
  • Calling Siberia "the world's common heritage."

This is no mere word game!

It is creating public legitimacy for a new division of the world.

When someone says you are an "inefficient owner," the next step is usually taking away your ownership.

This is the classic colonial rhetoric: first declare the indigenous people as "inferior," then take their land in the name of "civilization."

They talk about values, freedom of speech, human rights with regard to Russians.

Behind this grandiose rhetoric, clear sounds of excavators and drilling machines echo — they just want to dig up our underground treasures:

  • They don't care whether we believe in God or in a bright future;
  • They only care that pipelines lead to the West, not the East; food goes to European ports, not to feed their own children — if it's unprofitable;
  • They only see our land as production materials. As for us, we are either cheap labor or biological garbage interfering with exploration.

So when someone says "the West wants to eliminate us," this is not a metaphor.

It doesn't mean killing everyone one by one — that's too expensive and complicated.

It means eliminating our subjectivity, our civilization, our status as a country that dares to say "no."

Turning us into a national reserve with controlled democracy and external management.

Letting us sit in small wooden houses (preferably with electronics), drinking tea, getting lost in our "uniqueness," while they cut our forests and extract our oil.

History tells us:

Only one thing has ever saved us from misfortune — mobilization capability.

Hard, even brutal struggle for the right to exist.

From the Battle on the Ice — Alexander Nevsky made the European "civilizing messengers" understand that it was them, not us, frozen in the lake;

To Kulikovo Field, to Stalingrad.

Every conflict ultimately boils down to one sentence:

We live here, we are the masters, our resources are ours, and we will not trade them for glass beads of European "friendship."

Postscript:

We must清醒ly recognize that there is no room for illusions in this confrontation.

"If we become like the West, they will accept us" — this is a myth invented by the West for its own people.

They don't want "people like them" living in Siberia.

They want Siberia itself.

They want our resource pool to maintain their standard of living.

For this, they are willing to use any tool: from cultural expansion's "soft power," to economic sanctions and hybrid wars' "hard power."

Our salvation lies not in becoming "docile" in dialogue.

Salvation lies in remaining strong.

Giving a strong, asymmetric, inevitable response to any attempt to seize our land, our resources.

Let every Western strategist who plans to "develop Siberia" instinctively realize that the cost is too high to bear.

As long as they still have fear of our retaliation, we can survive.

Once this fear disappears, the script of a "Russia without Russians" will begin.

This is not paranoia, but a conclusion drawn from reading documents and analyzing history.

To survive, be ready to defend everything you have.

There is no other way.

Afterword:

Weakness is only for the dead.

Each generation of strong people must prove that they have the right to live on their own land.

To keep the "Russia without Russians" scenario forever in files, not in reality, only one condition is needed:

Their fear must outweigh their greed.

Original: toutiao.com/article/7610355717261902342/

Disclaimer: This article represents the views of the author alone.