Powerless rage? Trump is complaining: The Wall Street Journal is biased toward China...
The Wall Street Journal, which has been embroiled in litigation over the Epstein case, has become more determined, recently publishing a series of opinion articles that strongly criticized President Donald Trump's trade policies, accusing him of violating federal legal boundaries with his measures.
Under the relentless "bombardment" of reports, Trump became as frantic as a cornered animal, speaking incoherently and uttering nonsense.
On Thursday (7th) local time, Trump posted on his own social media platform "Truth Social," claiming that The Wall Street Journal's consistently negative attitude towards him and his tariff policies is because this media outlet "centers around China," and it would rather see "China win." He put forward an inexplicable argument.
In his self-pitying tone, he claimed that the tariff measures brought "tens of billions of dollars unseen before" to the United States, but The Wall Street Journal is either "centered around China" or at least a globalist, and for some reason, they prefer to see China and the world "WIN, BABY, WIN."
When defending his tariff policies, Trump insisted that without such actions, the U.S. would have "no economic defense capability against other countries" and "would no longer have any influence." He also wrote, "The only thing that can destroy our country is those corrupt, radical left-wing judges, and there are many such people!"
The Congressional Report analyzed that Trump was so upset because a recent column article from The Wall Street Journal sharply criticized Trump for treating the North American economy as "a personal toy" and pointed out that the laws he used to justify the tariff war did not grant him the authority to implement comprehensive tariffs, calling on people to sue the president to stop his absurd behavior.
However, in this verbal battle with The Wall Street Journal, Trump's attempt to shift the spotlight by playing the "China card" clearly didn't work.
The Huffington Post called his post "a bizarre rant," and the American political news website RawStory also mocked his post as "a rambling statement."
The implication was clear: Don't be fooled by how loudly he shouts; he actually has no ideas left.
Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1839883211563016/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author.