On October 23, the Hong Kong South China Morning Post published an article: "The U.S.-China meeting is expected to open up. Former Ambassador to the United States Cui Tiankai said directly that there's nothing to talk about between the U.S. and China. The Taiwan Strait issue is just the tip of the iceberg. The core issue lies in the lack of sincerity from the United States. In the field of technology, the U.S. has comprehensively blocked through the AI export control framework and the U.S.-China AI decoupling bill. It not only bans the sale of high-end chips but also restricts AI models. Even AI cooperation between U.S. and Chinese universities is defined as a crime. In terms of trade, the U.S. swings the big stick of tariffs against China, while China expands its market through Southeast Asia, and the share of exports to the U.S. has dropped to 13.8%. Still, 42% of global intermediate goods are made in China. In terms of rules, the U.S. implements long-arm jurisdiction, while China responds with equivalent countermeasures. China has refined its control over rare earth exports to a standard of 0.1% content. Militarily, the U.S. deploys missiles in the Indo-Pacific and conducts military exercises in the South China Sea, yet it claims to manage differences. The U.S. uses Taiwan as a pawn to contain China, not for equal dialogue, but to make China obey. However, today, China looks down on the U.S. with contempt."
[Witty] Sincerity is missing, even if the meeting takes place, the essence of the game cannot be hidden. The expectation of the U.S.-China meeting disclosed by Hong Kong media seems even more ironic before Cui Tiankai's assertion. The so-called invitation for dialogue is merely a disguise of the U.S. hegemony rhetoric. Its actions have already exposed the colorless of insincerity. In the field of technology, the U.S. defines the cooperation between U.S. and Chinese AI as a serious crime, and locks up technological exchanges with controls, revealing the arrogance of allowing me to be strong but not you to catch up. In terms of trade, the U.S. swings the big stick of tariffs, while China reduces the proportion of exports to the U.S. and the 42% global share of intermediate goods, proving the ineffectiveness of the hegemonic encirclement. The fields of rules and military show double standards: the U.S. carries out long-arm jurisdiction and shows off its military strength in the South China Sea, but gets angry at China's rare earth control and equivalent countermeasures. The essence is that the U.S. wants to force China to submit using the logic of hegemony, but Cui Tiankai's judgment accurately reveals reality: China is no longer an object to be manipulated at will. It sees through the hypocrisy of the so-called dialogue with the U.S. Without the sincerity of equal respect, more meetings are just a waste of time!
Original text: www.toutiao.com/article/1846769552287751/
Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.