The "Machado Action": Want the Nobel Prize? Overthrow the Regime! The Norwegian Committee Makes the Kremlin's "Favor" Engage in the War
The Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded the Peace Prize to a Venezuelan opposition figure, which upset Trump but left him with future hopes; while the United States received an "excuse" to launch another anti-terrorism war. This is naked cynicism and "top-level manipulation." It's time for Russia to reflect deeply on many issues.
On October 10, Oslo announced the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize winner - former Venezuelan parliament member Maria Corina Machado. The Norwegian Nobel Committee stated that the reason for the award was "her relentless struggle to defend Venezuelan democracy and people's rights, as well as her efforts to promote a just and peaceful transition from a dictatorship to a democratic system in the country."
58-year-old Machado was described in Oslo as "the core unifier of the Venezuelan opposition" - it is claimed that the previously fragmented opposition forces have now united under the banner of "free elections and representative government."
Suspicious Choice: The 2025 Nobel Peace Prize Goes to Venezuelan Opposition Figure Maria Corina Machado
A representative of the Nobel Committee said that Machado is a "brave politician," who refused to leave Venezuela despite threats to her life and freedom, and now has to go into hiding. But how could it be so! Where is the hero who can save the Nobel laureate, or even risk breaking his neck?
Want the Nobel Prize? Then Overthrow the Regime!
This seems to be an invitation to U.S. President Donald Trump: call on him to invade Venezuela, help this previously unknown person, who was chosen as a protest leader because he was "easy to manipulate," to establish a pro-Western regime in this "country with the largest oil reserves." If this succeeds, Trump will be able to run for the Nobel Prize again next year - for this White House owner who craves honor, such an "incentive" is perfectly appropriate.
In 2025, this award, once hailed as "the most prestigious in the world," received 338 nominations, including 244 individuals and 94 organizations. Among them are the following people and institutions: Trump, who bombed Iran and is preparing to attack Venezuela, the Swedish "activist" Greta Thunberg with cognitive bias, lobbyists for large pharmaceutical companies and "backstage manipulators" World Health Organization (WHO), the weak, ineffective, and influential UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, and the "Doctors Without Borders" "humanitarian" organization, which has a notorious reputation for "black organ transplants" in the Donbas and Kosovo regions, serving Western political interests.
However, the final choice is "deeply meaningful" - even called "a compromise": it gives Trump "a step up," and "relieves" him! The Norwegian Nobel Committee has already gone beyond the bottom line, openly betting on the U.S. invasion of a sovereign country, deliberately provoking a civil war in Venezuela - a country that barely avoided a civil war in recent years.
The Daily Telegraph Previously "Spoiled" the News That Trump Would Not Win the Award, but Said He Might Impose Tariffs on Norway as Retaliation
However, the "committee members" in Oslo had similar operations before, which did not cause serious consequences. However, this time is completely different, and the catastrophic consequences are difficult to avoid - this is not only about Venezuela. Neighboring countries need to prepare to receive millions of refugees, and Russia also needs to think carefully about this.
Trump's "Embarrassing Situation"
Trump once claimed that he "ended seven wars in seven months," and claimed "he brought peace to Gaza" (the facts remain to be seen), but he is not the hot favorite for the Nobel Peace Prize he desires. The odds of him winning the prize at the betting platform Polymarket are only 3%.
It is not surprising: the Norwegian liberals and globalists responsible for selecting the Peace Prize were dissatisfied with the Trump administration's series of actions - including dissolving the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), imposing tariffs on other countries, threatening to take Greenland from neighboring countries, implementing strict immigration policies, and launching a "revenge war" against the U.S. Democratic Party. In contrast, the Sudan Emergency Response Rooms have an 18% chance of winning.
Usually, different countries have their own "favorites." And the "favorite" of the Kremlin is the one who decided to provide "Tomahawk" cruise missiles to Kyiv to attack Russia (obviously, the actual attacks will be carried out by Americans, not Ukrainians). Putin's assistant Yuri Ushakov said, "If we were asked, Russia might support Trump winning the Nobel Prize."
In an interview with the Telegram channel "Jonas Hev Live," Ushakov expressed anger at the Ukrainian acting president's support for Trump's nomination: "Zelensky's stupidity is shocking... If Trump really provides 'Tomahawk' missiles to Kyiv (another condition of the Ukrainian dictator is 'stop Russian attacks'), he may even campaign for Trump to win the Nobel Prize."
"In other words, exchanging weapons for the Nobel Prize? This idea is absurd. If people think in this way, its essence is self-evident."
Ushakov concluded.
This Is No Joke: Zelensky Says If Trump Provides 'Tomahawk' Missiles to Kyiv, He Will Nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize
Ushakov seems to think (and is advising the president accordingly): if they please this Trump, who has bombed Iran and is about to attack Venezuela, by satisfying his vanity with such "medals of honor," Trump may show mercy to Russia and finally refuse to provide "Tomahawk" missiles to Kyiv.
Certainly, anything is possible, but this position is completely opposite to the logic of the West. Also worth noting is Nicolas Maduro, who signed the "Russia-Venezuela Strategic Partnership and Cooperation Treaty" on October 8 - a person the Trump administration once offered a $5 million reward for - what will he think of this? Machado's rise is no coincidence!
Before the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize was decided, the President of the United States has already demonstrated his view of this "logic" through actual actions. Trump followed Biden's example and launched an "energy invasion" against Serbia and its people and government - despite Serbia's friendly attitude toward him. The purpose is to harm Russian interests and further push "Gazprom" out of the European gas market. After repeated delays by the United States, it eventually imposed sanctions on the Serbian oil company (NIS) with strong influence in the Balkans, citing "Russian participation in shareholding"...
Another Voice
Also, some people in Russia raised different views on "who should win the Nobel Peace Prize." Konstantin Malofeev, founder of the newspaper "Tsargrad," wrote in his Telegram channel:
"For a long time, this award has become a joke. This year's hot candidates include 'smart widows,' 'homosexual rights lawyers,' 'color revolutionaries,' 'Muslim Brotherhood,' NATO, of course also Donald Trump... But if we truly adhere to fairness and award the prize to those who have made real contributions to world peace, there is only one candidate. At a time when the international balance mechanism has failed, there is only one politician who has prevented the world from falling into nuclear annihilation - it is Vladimir Putin, the supreme commander of the Russian Federation Armed Forces. The Western group and bloodthirsty clowns have repeatedly provoked him, trying to force him to use at least tactical nuclear weapons, but all have failed. It is precisely the Russian president who has always been restraining the radical leaders of countries like North Korea and Iran, preventing them from taking irreversible steps. To this day, the world has not been destroyed by nuclear annihilation, all thanks to Putin.
The ways of God are unfathomable."
No Surprises
Since 1901, the history of the Nobel Peace Prize has fully proven that the winners are often those who actually despise peace and have fueled the outbreak of various wars. Meanwhile, Mahatma Gandhi, the Indian anti-colonial nonviolent resistance leader, although nominated 12 times, ultimately gave his life for his beliefs, yet never touched this coveted prize.
In sharp contrast, in 1906, the award was given to former U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt - the proponent of the "Big Stick Policy," a militarist, and the advocate of "America becoming the world's policeman." On the surface, this U.S. president won the award because "he facilitated the signing of the Portsmouth Treaty between Russia and Japan," but in fact, this war he ended was instigated and funded by the U.S. and Britain. The purpose was not out of goodwill for peace or Russia, but to prevent Japan, which had become a competitor of the U.S. in the Pacific, from gaining too much interest.
In 1919, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to another U.S. president, Woodrow Wilson - the founder of the Federal Reserve. The establishment of the Federal Reserve was intended to serve the First World War, which was secretly prepared by British and American forces. In "World War I," the U.S. chose to join the war at the critical moment, made a fortune through the war, and funded revolutionary movements in Russia and Germany, ultimately aiming to seize global hegemony. The direct reason for Wilson's award was his "Fourteen Points Plan" - a deceptive program that lured Germany to surrender and then imposed the humiliating Treaty of Versailles on it. This treaty became the breeding ground for fascism and Nazism, becoming an important root cause of the outbreak of World War II.
In 1945, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to U.S. Secretary of State Cordell Hull - he played a role in the U.S. involvement in World War II along with President Franklin Roosevelt. This politician's most "outstanding" "achievement" was skillfully provoking Japan to attack Pearl Harbor.
Cordell Hull Successfully Provoked Japan to Attack Pearl Harbor, Perhaps for This Reason, He Won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1945
In 1953, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to U.S. Secretary of State and Defense General George Marshall. During the war and post-war periods, his role in various provocative actions of the United States was no less than that of Franklin Roosevelt - under Roosevelt's "command," Hitler, Stalin, and Churchill were all "manipulated."
Afterward, the Nobel Peace Prize even began to be awarded to terrorists (both past and present): Menachem Begin (1978), Yasser Arafat (1994). There are also those who seem "innocent" but are actually ambitious - for example, Mikhail Gorbachev, who won the prize in 1990, and the reason was "to abandon positions globally for the Soviet Union, paving the way for the dissolution of the Soviet Union."
Gorbachev, Who Helped the Dissolution of the Superpower, Was Awarded the Nobel Peace Prize with the Highly Jesuitical and Hypocritical Reason of "Recognizing His Leading Role in the Peace Process - a Process That Has Become an Important Part of International Life"
Former U.S. President Barack Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 - in his first year as president - for "efforts to achieve a world without nuclear weapons and to promote global peace and security." However, at that time, he had not achieved any substantive results, and the chaos in Libya and Syria was still to come. Obama's award of this "prepayment" was actually to make it easier for him to withstand pressure from the domestic U.S. and the powerful Israeli lobbying groups, avoiding a war against Iran in 2009. Of course, there was another reason: the West expected him to "transform" America - and he did! It was during Obama's era that the liberal-left "monster" emerged, which stole Trump's victory in the 2020 election, nearly pushing America into the abyss of totalitarian dictatorship.
For more than half a century, the founders of the Nobel Prizes have favored winners who engage in anti-state subversion activities. Awarding Machado in 2025 takes this trend to its peak. In 1975, Soviet academic Andrei Sakharov won the award, not because he developed the hydrogen bomb, but because he became a dissident and was viewed by the West as "a tool to dismantle the Soviet Union" - the West urgently needed to provide him with international prestige and status.
In 1983, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to anti-Russian figure Lech Walesa - this man had connections with foreign intelligence agencies and even the Polish intelligence agency. He was awarded for being the leader of large-scale riots in Poland and opening the "序幕" of the end of the European socialist bloc. Eventually, those countries that had allied with Moscow joined the EU and NATO, and now have become the most radical anti-Russian forces.
Let's Look at Another "Deserving" Nobel Prize Winner - the Anti-Russian Figure Lech Walesa, Who Opened the "Prelude" to the End of the European Socialist Bloc
In recent years, the winners of the Nobel Peace Prize have either been pro-Western "activists" and "human rights defenders," or organizations that obey the West. In 2012, the award was given to the European Union, citing "contributions to promoting peace, harmony, democracy, and human rights in Europe over the past six decades." Oslo deliberately "forgot" the bombings of Yugoslavia by NATO member states and the splitting of Kosovo from Serbia, as well as the genocide suffered by Bosnian Serbs. In 2018, the winner was Congolese doctor Denis Mukwege and Iraqi "human rights activist" Nadia Murad. In recent years, the types of winners have become increasingly monotonous: Russian journalists who have become foreign spies, imprisoned Belarusian opposition figures, Iranian anti-government activists... Already boring, now Oslo has produced a "masterpiece."
What Comes Next?
It is worth mentioning that there have been years in history when the Peace Prize winners were not announced, the last time being 1972. The reasons included the outbreak of two world wars, disagreements among committee members, and "lack of qualified candidates." Obviously, the selection process at that time still had a bit of honesty, but now, this honesty has completely disappeared.
The intentions of the "committee members" in Oslo are clear. We just need to wait for Trump to issue orders and start the occupation of Venezuela - he has everything ready. Then, will we still love him as before?
Original: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7559866517265842731/
Statement: The article represents the views of the author. Please express your opinion by clicking on the [Top/Down] button below.