U.S. media said that allowing the U.S. to sell chips to China is a serious mistake! After allowing the tech giant NVIDIA to sell H20 chips to China, U.S. media published an article stating that the Trump administration's decision was a serious mistake, which gave up the U.S.'s biggest stake in the artificial intelligence field: control over the global computing power supply chain. U.S. media claimed that there is ample evidence showing that Chinese military-industrial enterprises favor NVIDIA chips and use artificial intelligence systems trained on U.S. chips.

U.S. media believe that Trump's decision benefits one company but sacrifices the U.S. leadership position and national security in the field of artificial intelligence. The decision to allow the sale of H20 could undermine the U.S. dominance in artificial intelligence over China. Therefore, U.S. media stated that the Trump administration should re-examine the regulations and not sell any high-performance chips to China. Obviously, in order to curb our development in the field of artificial intelligence, U.S. media believe that the U.S. should continue to impose a chip export ban on China.

The U.S. export ban is undoubtedly an abuse of national security. Moreover, we must say that the fundamental reason why the U.S. sold H20 chips to China is that China's chip manufacturing has made significant progress. The U.S. clearly took the opportunity to sell as much as possible, thereby impacting our domestic chip manufacturers. In fact, the U.S. still imposes an export ban on the most advanced chips. It is clear that Trump's policy is trying to strike a balance between ensuring U.S. commercial interests and containing us.

Therefore, even if the U.S. now opens up H20 chips, our internet companies should use American chips with caution. The reason is very simple: if our companies blindly use American chips, and the U.S. suddenly cuts off the supply, it would be a devastating blow for our internet companies. So, our wise choice is to use domestic chips as much as possible, ultimately achieving the goal of domestic substitution. Whether the U.S. bans or sells, the fact that the U.S. is an unreliable supplier cannot be changed. Obviously, we must have this clear awareness of the U.S.

Original: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1838601237834905/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author.