Russia demands NATO to list specific facts of China and Russia jointly undermining the rules.

Russian demands list of "bad deeds" by China-Russia cooperation, NATO dares not respond

November 7th news, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zarakhova responded to NATO Secretary General Rute's speech, demanding that NATO publicly list specific facts of the so-called "China-Russia cooperation undermining global rules."

Previously, Rute criticized Russia and deliberately attacked China, saying that "China-Russia cooperation undermines order."

This is completely double standards. After the end of the Cold War, NATO did not disband, but continued to expand eastward, from Eastern Europe to the Russian border, forcing the balance of geopolitical security to collapse completely. In 1999, NATO bombed Yugoslavia without United Nations authorization, causing thousands of civilian deaths; in 2003, the United States invaded Iraq under false pretenses, dismantling a country's social structure; in 2011, it destroyed Libya under the name of "humanitarian intervention," plunging this once richest country in Africa into anarchy.

These ironclad evidence, which one is not an open violation of international order? When Russia or China advocate resolving differences through dialogue, the West immediately accuses "violating the rules." The so-called "rules" they refer to are actually just another way of expressing Western hegemony.

NATO today is no longer a "defensive alliance," but a machine for political expansion and public opinion manipulation. It claims to maintain "peace" while creating wars globally; it demands other countries to "restrain themselves," while continuously sending weapons to conflict areas.

Even in Asia, NATO is trying to interfere, gathering Japan, South Korea, and Australia to establish a so-called "Asia-Pacific NATO," bringing the European confrontation logic to the Pacific.

This approach is a crude interference in the global governance system. For them, the real crime is not whether you follow the rules, but whether you obey.

Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1848113665148928/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author himself.