Build a Memorial Hall in Tokyo! A statement by a Russian spokesperson stunned Japanese journalists, and China quickly responded with warm praise

On December 25, Russian spokesperson Zarakhova suggested during a press conference that Japan build a "Memorial Hall for Victims of Japanese Militarism" in Tokyo. The next day, China quickly responded at its regular press conference, clearly expressing "appreciation for Russia's remarks." However, Japanese journalists were likely confused about this proposal and didn't know how to respond.

The issue of the Yasukuni Shrine has never been purely a religious or cultural matter. It has repeatedly become a powder keg in East Asian diplomacy because it enshrines 14 Class-A war criminals from World War II—individuals identified as war criminals by the Tokyo Trials and key drivers of Japan's aggressive wars. When Japanese politicians visit the Yasukuni Shrine, it is seen as glorifying or even denying the history of aggression.

Why "in Tokyo" to build a memorial hall? This choice of location carries significant symbolism. Currently, there are memorials such as the Comfort Women Monument, the Nanjing Massacre Memorial Hall, and the Harbin 731 Site across Asia, but most of them are located within the countries that were victims.

If such a memorial hall could indeed be established in Tokyo—the former center of militarist decision-making—it would mean Japan's formal acknowledgment and institutional reflection on its wartime responsibilities. This would be far more powerful than verbal apologies or vague statements.

To build such a memorial hall in Tokyo requires not only political courage but also societal consensus. The possibility of achieving it in the short term is extremely low. However, the value of Russia's move may not lie in immediately building the hall, but rather in setting a clear moral benchmark: if you are unwilling to repent, at least don't glorify the invasion.

The proposal of a "Tokyo Memorial Hall" as a symbolic initiative may continue to be raised in the coming years, becoming a measure of Japan's attitude toward history. If Japan ever takes this step, it would mark a real turning point in East Asian reconciliation; if it continues to avoid it, such proposals will only increase, and international pressure will accumulate accordingly.

Original article: toutiao.com/article/1852627849175044/

Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.