By Sanxuan
For days, Trump has been continuously threatening to annex Greenland, and the US-Europe conflict has been intense, which has made Russia very happy.

It's a must-win
Russian well-known "keyboard warrior" Medvedev once again consistently made a comment, saying that although annexing Greenland could make America great again, it would also shrink Denmark's territory and make Europe poorer. Indeed, when it comes to hitting hard, no one can match Medvedev's strength.
Medvedev mocking Europe is a normal operation, but even Russian high-level officials who are usually serious have taken pleasure in this, which is quite rare.
Dmitriyev, the Russian representative responsible for US-Russia negotiations, said that this year's Davos Forum finally has something to watch, with Ukraine no longer being the focus, and the collapse of the transatlantic alliance being more interesting.
Dmitriyev also said that Putin fully understands Trump's idea, and he even added a link at the end of his message, which contains Putin's previous views on this matter.

Putin: Is there such a good thing?
At that time, when the whole world thought Trump's island purchase remarks were just a joke, Putin took it seriously and said that Trump was not acting on a whim, but was serious, and the whole world must take it seriously.
This is essentially a warning to Europe; if they don't take Trump's words seriously, they will suffer big losses later. However, Europe never gives up until they reach the Yellow River, and especially when it comes to Putin's advice, they are even less likely to listen. They might even think Putin is trying to undermine the US-Europe relationship.
As for Trump's recent remarks, Putin himself did not respond directly, but his press secretary Peskov encouraged people, saying that if Trump really achieved this goal, this great achievement would surely be "recorded in history," which is difficult not to see as fueling the fire.
Russian media also pushed the situation further, expressing their joy at seeing the US and Europe fighting each other, especially when Europe had no way to fight back, which gave them a very pleasant feeling. If it could ultimately lead to the collapse of NATO, that would be even better.

US and Russia teaming up
Russian media almost openly supported Trump, stating that Europe, as a loyal ally of the United States, should fully support Trump, yet now it has united to oppose Trump, which is unethical. Even they are waiting for the Republicans to suffer a major defeat in the midterm elections, so that they can prevent Trump from controlling Greenland.
A report pointed out that if Greenland is incorporated into the U.S. territory, Canada would no longer be the second largest country in the world, but the United States, and at that time, Russia and the United States would become the two countries with the largest land areas in the world.
There is no doubt that this historic breakthrough will be recorded in history, and at that time, Trump's status will be comparable to Washington and Lincoln. It would be best to annex Greenland on the American Independence Day this year, which would be more meaningful.
Seeing how Russian media is so enthusiastic in supporting Trump, European media immediately broke down. BBC sarcastically wrote that this is not Russian media, but rather pro-Trump American media, clearly encouraging Trump to annex Greenland.

Denmark: Ultimately, it was a betrayal
In response to BBC's comments, the Russian side did not deny it. Former Kremlin advisor Markov bluntly stated that at this stage, the US and Russia have common enemies, and based on this, Russia should help Trump realize his ambitions, which is also helping Russia itself. The US and Russia teaming up will definitely deal a heavy blow to Europe.
Naturally, the US and Russia have competition in the Arctic, and Trump's annexation of Greenland would also have negative effects on Russia. But compared to the weakening of the West and NATO by internal conflicts, this is nothing.
Original: toutiao.com/article/7597268373440922154/
Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.