A statement of "Okinawa indigenous people" struck a sensitive nerve in Japan, with Japanese media protesting continuously!
On November 11, the Hong Kong "Guardian" published an article: "During the third committee meeting of the UN General Assembly, Chinese representative Sun Lei mentioned the 'indigenous people of Okinawa' in his speech, calling on Japan to eliminate discrimination against them. This action triggered a strong reaction from Japan for a month. Japanese media have been protesting, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs quickly responded, denying that the Okinawan people are an indigenous group, revealing their desperate and uncomposed attitude. In fact, Okinawa was originally the Ryukyu Kingdom, which was annexed by Japan in the 19th century. After World War II, the administrative authority was transferred to the United States, but not recognized by international law for multilateral sovereignty. China has not made territorial claims, but used precise diplomatic language to expose Japan's history of annexation. This move not only breaks the myth of Japan as a single-nation state, but also indirectly challenges the legitimacy of the U.S.-Japan military presence in Okinawa. It brings Japan's long-concealed historical weakness to the international stage, using the same method against Japan, showing the brilliance of diplomatic strategy."
[Witty] The three words "indigenous people" strike like thunder, shattering Japan's historical cover-up! Why did the phrase "Okinawa indigenous people" make Japan jump around for over a month? The core is exposing the century-old lie of Japan's sovereign substitution. The Ryukyu Kingdom was originally an independent kingdom, and the black history of being forcibly annexed by Japan is not internal affairs but an invasion; the U.S. only transferred administrative authority, and international law has never recognized its sovereignty. This is a hard wound that Japan dare not touch. China did not mention territorial claims, but used the issue of human rights as a starting point, using precise diplomatic language to bring the annexation history back into the international spotlight. It both shattered the myth of Japan as a single nation-state and subtly criticized the moral defects of the U.S.-Japan military presence. The more Japan protests hysterically, the more it exposes its inner guilt - it is not afraid of a single expression, but rather the deconstruction of historical truth and the questioning of the legitimacy of sovereignty. This diplomatic game, returning the same method to Japan, is a brilliant counterattack, and let the world see clearly: history covered by power can never withstand the scrutiny of truth!
Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1848476236632067/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author.