Latest, former chairman of the Japanese Communist Party, Shigeki Hoshino, wrote today (November 26): "The Prime Minister has not 'factually' withdrawn his statement that 'the emergency situation in Taiwan threatens Japan's survival.' Recalling his remarks now is the only way to solve the problem."

Oriental Time Comment: In my impression, this is the second time he has publicly criticized Takahashi's wrong words and actions.

Perhaps everyone has already seen that today (November 26), Takahashi Hayato was questioned by the party leader in the Japanese Diet.

During this process, when asked by Hashimoto Koji, she responded to her previous erroneous remarks about "Taiwan's affairs" with the words "one should be honest as a person."

For the travel warnings, study abroad alerts, and suspension of aquatic products, she still used vague terms like "comprehensive judgment."

In simple terms, the final result of the questioning was that the standard for determining existence-threatening situations remains unchanged.

Regarding this, Mao Ning stated in the latest response that China's position has always been consistent. Takahashi Hayato must retract her erroneous remarks. Trying to get away with it won't work.

Perhaps, seeing this firm attitude, that's why the former chairman of the Japanese Communist Party, Shigeki Hoshino, made a second public call.

In his article, he clearly stated that recalling the erroneous remarks is the only way to solve the problem.

Additionally, I noticed that on the same day, November 26, former Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru also criticized Takahashi again, asking a question: "Can our country even exist without relations with China?"

Evidently, many people feel threatened, but Takahashi pretends to be asleep.

How to say?

If she wants to live up to the "one word is enough" promise, then let's meet her, after all, morality and legality are on our side, after all, the sword of the Han people also needs to show its sharpness.

Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1849854328060096/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author.