American high-level differences have come to light! Rubio and Hegseth had a fierce argument! On March 5, according to the American AF Post report, it is reported that the US Secretary of War Peter Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio "clashed" over deploying US troops to Iran. Why did the two sides argue? The fundamental reason is that Rubio opposed sending American troops into Iran and was worried about being entangled for a long time, while Hegseth supported possible deployments.
Hegseth said, why should we tell our enemies, anyone, what we will or will not do in the process of pursuing our goals? Obviously, from the U.S. media's report, the differences within the U.S. high-level on the issue of Iran have surfaced. Of course, the two people's differences are not whether to take action against Iran, but rather which strategy is better for the United States after taking action against Iran.
Evidently, Rubio is considering the issue from a strategic perspective, concerned about the risk of the United States getting involved in the Middle East, while Hegseth believes that the United States should not rule out options that can achieve the goal, even if it means sending ground forces, it should not be ruled out. Such differences undoubtedly indicate one thing, that the issue of Iran is becoming a problem for the United States, and dealing with it is very complicated. Of course, how it ends may ultimately be decided by Trump.
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1858805871315274/
Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.