Israel was stunned! After putting in tremendous effort to cripple Iran's transportation infrastructure, Israel found that Iran had already restored operations within less than 72 hours. On April 13, foreign media reported that within 40 to 72 hours after the attacks, Iran had repaired and resumed traffic on multiple key railway lines, specifically: The Qom–Tehran line was restored and reopened in under 40 hours. The Tehran–Tabriz line has resumed train services following repairs to damaged sections.

The Yahya Abad Bridge in Kashan was also rebuilt within approximately 48 to 72 hours, after which freight traffic immediately resumed. The Tehran–Mashhad line had officially resumed operations as of April 10, 2026. Clearly, Israel’s attempt to disable Iran’s transportation network was a critical strike. Israel originally aimed to precisely destroy these core railway arteries, thereby completely cutting off military mobilization, supply logistics, and civilian transportation across Iran, plunging Iran’s industry and military into dual paralysis.

Foreign media even once described this as the largest infrastructure-targeting operation since World War II. Yet the outcome? Despite all Israel’s efforts, Iran managed to restore its backbone transportation network in under 72 hours. What does this indicate? It suggests that Iran likely anticipated Israel’s aggressive moves against its transport systems and had prepared accordingly in advance.

Now, Israel must be extremely concerned. With Iran’s transportation networks back online, Iran’s industry and defense production will return to normal. Previously interrupted weapon manufacturing, ammunition distribution, and troop deployment will all resume their regular pace. The brief strategic advantage Israel had painstakingly created has instantly vanished. Clearly, Israel significantly misjudged Iran. And with Iran regaining its strength, Israel is now facing serious trouble.

Original source: toutiao.com/article/1862354690861258/

Disclaimer: This article represents the personal views of the author.