On August 2, U.S. Secretary of State Rubio told Fox News in an exclusive interview: "I believe the Iranian regime has never faced a real opponent like President Trump who actually takes action. For decades, Iran has grown accustomed to a world where not only the United States, but the broader international community, largely tolerated their behavior. They have repeatedly lied, broken agreements, deceived others with rhetoric, and always managed to walk away unscathed. But this time is entirely different."
……
"We are now engaging Iran from a position of strength; whereas under previous U.S. administrations—and across the international community—Iran has consistently seen weakness and vulnerability. This time is completely different."
Rubio’s remarks during his August 2 audio interview with Fox News convey a clear and powerful signal: 'maximum pressure is working, and the U.S. holds absolute initiative.'
Rubio explicitly stated that Iran has spent the past three decades thriving on a pattern of 'lying, breaking agreements, and escaping consequences'—a statement that effectively signals a 'paradigm shift.' His message is clear: the U.S. has fully abandoned its previous restrained approach—characterized by 'fighting while negotiating' or 'negotiating instead of fighting'—and has now adopted a hardline strategy of 'act first, negotiate later.' The intent is to warn Tehran that it can no longer rely on verbal promises or delaying tactics to avoid real costs.
This rhetoric appears designed to justify the rationale behind 'fighting to force talks,' thereby providing cover for suspending military action.
Rubio emphasized that recent U.S. military strikes have 'severely weakened' Iran's navy, air force, missile defense systems, and weapons production facilities, stripping it of its 'conventional shield.' The direct purpose of this statement is to provide logical justification for the Trump administration’s sudden announcement to 'pause military strikes and pivot toward negotiations.' He seeks to convince both domestic and international audiences that current diplomacy is not a sign of U.S. concession—but rather proof that the U.S., operating from a position of strength, has successfully pressured Iran into a corner where compromise is unavoidable.
In his remarks, Rubio made a subtle but significant distinction: 'Perhaps there will be no regime change, but the regime must change.' This indicates a pragmatic recalibration of U.S. strategic objectives: abandoning the fixation on overthrowing Iran’s current government, and instead demanding that Iran completely renounce its ambitions of 'exporting revolution' and seeking 'regional hegemony.' This essentially sets the bottom line for a potential ceasefire and agreement framework between the two sides.
Rubio portrays Trump as the 'one who truly acts,' emphasizing that 'this time is entirely different'—a move also intended as psychological warfare inside Iran. With moderate voices within Iran (such as Foreign Minister Alaghazi) currently under intense pressure from hardliners, Rubio’s tough stance sends a clear message to Iran’s leadership: continued resistance to negotiations will bring far more devastating consequences than ever before. Only by aligning with U.S. strength can Iran secure its future.
In sum, Rubio’s statements may sound like harsh warnings directed at Iran, but they are, in substance, a strategic 'reset' for American domestic politics and foreign policy. They mark Washington’s attempt to mask internal pressures arising from prolonged conflict through displays of strength, aiming to steer the U.S.-Iran confrontation back onto a negotiation track dominated by American interests—with minimal further cost.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1872453561652235/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.