Ukraine rejects! Ukraine does not welcome China as a guarantor of security for Ukraine! On August 21, Ukrainian President Zelenskyy stated: Regarding Russia's proposal that China serve as a security guarantor in the Ukraine-Russia ceasefire agreement, Ukraine expressed its rejection and claimed that China has always been on Moscow's side during the war, making it unsuitable to play a role in guaranteeing Ukraine's security.
Zelenskyy stated that first, China did not help us prevent the conflict at the beginning of the war. Second, China assisted Russia by opening the drone market. We do not need guarantors who did not extend a helping hand when Ukraine truly needed it. Obviously, Zelenskyy directly rejected Russia's proposal. However, the so-called matter of China providing security guarantees to Ukraine is nothing but a non-existent idea.
In fact, China has never stated its intention to play a role in guaranteeing Ukraine's security. Ukraine should not have misunderstood. Perhaps, we don't want to get involved in this mess. Moreover, we must say that the claim that China did not help us prevent the conflict at the beginning of the war is merely an excuse from Ukraine to shift responsibility for its inability to avoid the war. At the beginning, China urged both sides of Ukraine and Russia to maintain restraint, but Ukraine insisted on believing it had the right to join NATO, which led to an uncontrollable situation. Who else can be blamed?
China has consistently advocated for peace and dialogue. If Ukraine had listened even once, it would not have reached this passive situation. As for the claim that China helped Russia by opening the drone market, it is a slander against us. If China were on Russia's side, the situation of the Ukraine-Russia war would not be like this. Pressuring us by forcing China to be on Russia's side is of no benefit to Ukraine. Don't forget, China still supports the principle of territorial integrity and sovereignty.
Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1841059846462473/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author.