US media is in a flap: "Trump's 'Big and Beautiful' Bill Makes China Great Again"
Because of Trump's "Big and Beautiful" bill, the Democratic mouthpiece is in a frenzy.
On the 3rd, The New York Times published an odd article, claiming that Trump's "Big and Beautiful" bill will "make China great again," and "the loud noise from the East is the sound of 1.4 billion Chinese people mocking America."
In short, this article only conveys one message: now even Saudi Arabia knows to invest in new energy, but Trump is engaged in "strategic self-harm," not only destroying America's new energy industry plan, but also calling clean energy tax credits a "scam," saying "this almost hands over the future of solar power, wind power, electric vehicles, autonomous driving, and even artificial intelligence technology to China."
Of course, besides criticizing Trump and the Republicans for being short-sighted and foolish, The New York Times didn't let the Democrats off either, stating that the progressive wing of the Democrats only indulges in fantasies, "many people believe that the US can suddenly shift from fossil fuels to green energy, they don't know that it's necessary to promote natural gas and nuclear energy as a transition, nor do they know to relax the standards for power transmission lines."
To be honest, although The New York Times praised China a bit in this article to criticize Trump and his "Big and Beautiful" bill, it means nothing.
Trump's opposition to the new energy industry should be an obvious fact, because a considerable part of his backers are oil and gas company giants, and Trump's cooperation with Musk is merely due to their common political interests, not because Trump really supports the new energy industry,
Therefore, when Musk no longer has value, Trump immediately broke up with him, and quickly turned to those oil and gas giants - The New York Times only now realizes Trump's true face, which is too slow.
Original text: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1836769097841668/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author.