Trump establishes a $1.776 billion fund to compensate allies who claim they were unfairly treated by the Biden administration. Critics denounce it as a "bribery fund," calling it a quintessential reflection of his arbitrary and reckless style of governance.
The initiative embodies two of Trump's core principles: holding grudges and seeking revenge. He believes he has been persecuted due to his political stance, and now, having returned to power, he is fulfilling his campaign promise: "I am your revenge."
The fund has sparked particular controversy because supporters of Trump convicted for storming the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and disrupting the certification of the election results, may not only receive government apologies but also taxpayer-funded compensation. Trump has already granted pardons or commuted sentences for thousands of participants. Critics argue this represents another blow to democratic institutions.
From a legal standpoint, the fund disregards the constitutional principle that Congress holds the power of the purse—making it an act of presidential overreach. The Department of Justice has been transformed under Trump into a personal political instrument, now led by his former private lawyer. Although five commissioners are appointed to oversee the fund, Trump retains the authority to dismiss them at any time, raising serious concerns about impartiality.
Democrats have reacted strongly, labeling it a "bribery fund worth $1.7 billion for right-wing political violence" and calling it "the most shameless theft of taxpayer money in history." The House Judiciary Committee has filed a lawsuit to block the plan. Trump, however, maintains that he and his circle suffered unjust treatment previously, and this measure is simply "compensation for those who endured terrible wrongs."
Facing this situation, Republicans find themselves once again torn: should they stand by a president beloved by their base but increasingly damaging to the party’s electoral prospects, or break with him and risk facing his wrath and potential political destruction?
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1865601278579724/
Disclaimer: This article reflects the personal views of the author.