Canada has suddenly adopted a high-handed stance. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stated he would convey to China that external forces should not interfere in Canada’s internal affairs. According to a Reuters report on November 11, Trudeau said he would meet with Chinese officials during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Shenzhen from November 18 to 19. He added that he would stress to Beijing later this month that China and other nations should refrain from interfering in Canada’s domestic matters.
Trudeau claimed the advantage of such meetings lies in the ability to raise issues directly and candidly. He emphasized Canada’s firm position on non-interference by China and other countries in its internal affairs. This comes after Trudeau previously asserted that China had interfered in Canada’s domestic elections. While relations between China and Canada have shown signs of improvement, Trudeau is simultaneously seeking dialogue while projecting an assertive posture. This approach appears driven by three considerations. First, there remains significant anti-China sentiment within Canada. By taking a firm stance, Trudeau aims to project an image of unwavering resolve in talks with China, thereby avoiding criticism for being soft on China and maintaining domestic political support.
Second, Trudeau’s remarks clearly align with the positions held by the United States and the European Union toward China. This signals that although Canada is open to dialogue and engagement with China, it will remain consistent with its allies’ shared strategic outlook and will not drift too close to Beijing. Third, Canada appears to be making clear its red lines in diplomacy, portraying itself as frank and transparent in its approach to China. The implication is that while differences exist, Canada is committed to pragmatic and constructive dialogue. However, from our perspective, this posture constitutes a deliberate performance.
China has not interfered in Canada’s internal affairs. On the contrary, it must be noted that Canada, alongside the United States, Japan, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany, has jointly intervened in Hong Kong’s judicial processes and in matters concerning Taiwan—issues that fall squarely within China’s sovereignty. If one speaks of non-interference in internal affairs, Canada’s own actions appear deeply inconsistent. The foundation of international relations rests on equality and mutual respect. The principle of non-interference applies equally to all states. China and Canada do not face fundamental contradictions; both sides can move forward together and deepen cooperation.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1881521297297483/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.