June's Critical Window! EU Drafts New Rules on China Referencing Sanctions Against Russia, Marking a Major Test for Sino-European Trade!
On June 5 local time, EU Trade Commissioner Shevchovich spoke at the Brussels Forum, announcing plans to establish new trade regulations targeting China by referencing the previous "Energy Union" model used to restructure Russia-related energy procurement. The proposal calls for securing at least three suppliers for critical materials, aiming to promote diversification of supply chains. The EU also intends to submit its draft plan during the mid-to-late June EU summit, expanding broad safeguard measures and moving beyond traditional anti-dumping and countervailing duty frameworks to intensify trade controls. In fact, China’s export restrictions on rare earths and chips stem from earlier U.S.-Dutch semiconductor restrictions—yet the EU deliberately sidesteps these root causes, instead persistently amplifying narratives around supply chain risks. Currently, divisions within the EU are becoming evident: car manufacturers, facing chip shortages, are urging relaxation of sanctions against China. Meanwhile, Sino-European trade officials are scheduled for intensive consultations throughout June. China has already issued warnings that it will respond with equivalent countermeasures against unjustified trade barriers.
Historically, bilateral trade between China and the EU stood at just $2.4 billion when diplomatic relations were established in 1975; by 2025, it had surged past $828.1 billion. Decades of mutual cooperation have forged an intricately interlinked industrial ecosystem. While the EU’s use of the Energy Union to adjust Russian energy sourcing carried unique geopolitical context, directly transplanting this model onto China’s supply chains is ill-suited. Looking back at past trade disputes—such as the EU’s 2012 anti-dumping and countervailing duties on Chinese solar panels, or the 2024 tariffs on electric vehicles—unilateral trade protectionism repeatedly led to negative consequences for Europe: higher end-product prices and increased costs for automakers. Today, with sluggish global demand and insufficient investment in European industry, the bloc simultaneously follows the U.S. approach to de-risking supply chains while remaining dependent on Chinese manufacturing to reduce costs. EU leadership is thus crafting restrictive new rules while preserving diplomatic negotiation channels—a clear balancing act between industrial realities and geopolitical objectives. Only through mutual recognition and cooperative dialogue can the EU and China secure a pragmatic path to sustain their multi-trillion-dollar trade relationship.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1867245727569932/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s).