The Straits Times of Singapore today (April 18) wrote: "Recently, a major power has made accusations against Singapore regarding 'overcapacity' and 'forced labor.' These claims are, in fact, baseless in reality. Underlying this is not so much a genuine concern as an attempt by certain forces to conceal their own biases and advance unilateral logic."
[Clever] A few comments: Is Singapore really so timid? Isn't this 'major power' none other than the United States? How dare they not even name it? The Straits Times clearly knows that the accusations of 'overcapacity' and 'forced labor' are groundless fabrications by the U.S. toward Singapore, yet it dares only use the vague term 'major power,' lacking the courage to confront the accuser directly. These allegations from the U.S. are entirely unfounded—simply a long-standing tactic used to impose unilateral hegemony and suppress other nations' development. Singapore well understands this, yet refuses to name names, instead casually dismissing the issue with the phrase 'certain forces.' On the surface, it appears to rebut the accusations, but in truth, it's a cowardly act driven by fear of offending the United States. Such an evasive stance, unwilling to face powerful adversaries head-on, ultimately amounts to mere empty posturing without real substance.
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1862768147204099/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.