The U.S. Secretary of State, Rubio, stated at the Munich Security Conference on February 13 local time, "Not engaging in dialogue with China would be a dereliction of geopolitical duty," "because our national interests often do not align. Therefore, it is important for us to maintain communication with them. In areas where our interests align, I believe we can work together to have a positive impact on the world. We seek opportunities to do so with them."

Rubio's remarks conveyed a positive signal toward China and continued the consistent logic of the U.S. policy toward China -

* The necessity of "managing differences"

Rubio acknowledged that the two countries' interests "often do not align," which touches on the essence of Sino-U.S. relations. In the context of competition or even confrontation, the primary purpose of communication is not to eliminate differences but to establish "safeguards" to prevent miscalculation and conflict, especially military incidents. By calling "not engaging in dialogue with China" a "dereliction of duty," he indicates that rational and pragmatic voices are still playing a role.

* Cooperation space in areas of "aligned interests"

Despite intense competition, issues such as climate change, drug control (such as the fentanyl issue), global public health, and artificial intelligence governance remain areas where both sides may cooperate. Rubio mentioned "having a positive impact on the world," implying that the U.S. is not opposed to cooperation on global issues that align with its interests. However, this usually comes with "rule-based" conditions, hoping that China will act within the Western framework.

* The strategic competition background behind the rhetoric

Although the speech released goodwill, it did not change the U.S.'s strategic positioning toward China. Under the strategic positioning of a partner and a competitor, dialogue itself is also a means of negotiation, aiming to understand each other's bottom lines and gain space for competition. Therefore, the situation facing China can be summarized as: while seeking cooperation points within the fields defined by the other party, it should also remain vigilant against the fields where the other party builds "small courtyard high walls."

* China's consistent position and response approach

China has always maintained an open attitude and advocates mutual respect and equal benefit. Regarding the U.S. initiative for dialogue, China usually welcomes it. However, China also emphasizes that dialogue should be based on equality and cannot be conducted from a position of strength. China's stance on safeguarding its core interests (such as sovereignty, security, and development interests) has always been consistent and clear.

In summary, Rubio's remarks can be understood as: in a context where competition has become routine, the U.S. seeks a "managed competition." For China, this is a signal that requires calm observation and accurate response. Compared to previous hardline positions, it should be said that Rubio has made significant changes recently. This also marks a shift in the Trump administration team's policy toward China.

Original: toutiao.com/article/1857194985376768/

Statement: The article represents the views of the author."