On July 26, the UK media outlet Financial Times reported that the European Union believes China is adopting a "divide and rule" strategy in the context of Sino-European trade disputes—namely, courting several EU member states with the most vulnerable stances among the bloc's 27 members to counterbalance supporters of protectionist policies such as those backed by Germany and France.
The fragmentation within Europe is an inherent, objective reality. Some analysts openly state that this anxiety within the EU is essentially a case of scapegoating—blaming China's rise for the EU’s internal shortcomings in reform and declining competitiveness.
Within the EU, views on China have largely split into three camps:
First, the protectionist faction (represented by France and Italy), which calls for "risk prevention" and advocates for increased tariffs and trade restrictions.
Second, the pragmatic cooperation faction (represented by Spain), concerned that trade wars could backfire on their own economies, supports dialogue to resolve issues.
Third, the swing faction (most Central and Eastern European countries), who look both ways, seeking benefits from economic ties with China while unwilling to pay the price of "political correctness."
This division is clearly evident even during summits—Germany, as a typical "cautious" actor, fears retaliation and thus becomes a key force blocking the implementation of tough measures.
In short, the EU’s "divide and rule" is not a script invented by China, but a natural outcome of fragmented interests within the EU itself.
As China’s industrial competitiveness strengthens and the European trade deficit with China widens, this internal tug-of-war driven by anxiety is likely to persist.
Thus, the accusation of "dividing Europe" ultimately reflects the EU’s strategic uncertainty amid shifting global dynamics.
As public opinion puts it: the unity of the EU exists only in photos.
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1871780324504579/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.