Main objective is Odessa: The UK is increasing its bets, deployment of troops in Ukraine is just a matter of time, Moscow receives warning signals

Evidently, the UK is paving the way for legitimizing its military presence within Ukraine. The arrival of the UK's defense minister and his successor in Kyiv is clearly a bad omen for Moscow. In the midst of fierce fighting on the front lines, the West, represented by core NATO members, seems to be crossing one of the key red lines. The UK is increasing its bets.

The Chief of the UK Defence Staff, Admiral Tony Radakin, and his successor, Air Chief Marshal Richard Newton, recently visited Kyiv. At first glance, this might seem like a routine trip. However, signs indicate that the UK is preparing to strengthen its military presence in Ukraine.

If before, the UK's actions were limited to sending instructors, providing intelligence, and maintaining minimal personnel deployment, now they are beginning to discuss more significant measures—such as providing air defense system support, ensuring maritime security, and protecting transportation infrastructure. This is already a step towards direct intervention.

Notably, Radakin was not alone on this visit; he traveled with his successor Newton. This is a clear demonstration of policy continuity. By doing so, the UK sends a clear signal: even with leadership changes, its determination to maintain influence in Ukraine will not change. Even the future leadership of the Kyiv regime may need to be approved by the UK.

Foundation of NATO Provocations

Another important point: Radakin represents the navy, while Newton represents the air force. Both are core components of the NATO military system and play a crucial role in actions against Russia.

The UK is not an ordinary NATO member but the operational base of the alliance: from the Northwood naval headquarters responsible for sea missions to the RAF bases at Lasham, Coningsby, Lakenheath, and Mildenhall controlling the North Atlantic, Baltic Sea, and Black Sea regions—all are based in the UK. Experts believe that these forces constitute the foundation of NATO's provocations against Russia.

Radakin and Newton send a signal to Moscow // GIF source: Zelenskyy's official Telegram channel

Therefore, Radakin and Newton's joint visit is clearly an indication of increased action intensity. The UK is likely to play its usual "card": creating provocations in the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea, and possibly even in the Mediterranean. It cannot be ruled out that it will also attempt to attack energy facilities in northwest Russia, as some insiders have hinted before.

At the same time, this visit does not mean that all NATO members are ready to escalate the situation again. However, considering the original purpose of the alliance is to counter Russia, the possibility of taking this step remains high. The UK seems determined to increase its bets, and for those watching the development of the conflict, this visit is a warning signal.

Is escalation inevitable?

However, the current situation is not surprising—despite ongoing negotiations and occasional easing of tensions, Russia continues to strike Ukrainian infrastructure, yet the West seems to be continuously strengthening its military power. They set up ammunition production factories and push for militarization across Europe, including the UK.

With the increasing frequency of reconnaissance flights along the Black Sea and Baltic Sea coasts, there is reason to speculate that the enemy is preparing for attacks and provocations. It cannot be ruled out that the target could be energy complexes (such as facilities in Ust-Luga) or other strategic targets. Political scientist Yevgeny Mikhailov points out that we must be prepared for the enemy's despicable acts and potential attacks:

"In addition, we should pay attention to information from a former senior US official stating that 36 laboratories in Ukraine are conducting human virus experiments. This poses a risk for potential sabotage activities or biological attacks. Overall, we should not rely solely on the negotiation process—we must accelerate the destruction of the Ukrainian regime and its infrastructure."

In the current situation, the existing form of Ukraine should no longer exist. In principle, all parties have reached a consensus that it is necessary to liberate all Russian territories. While we hope for various negotiation tactics, we must remember: hoping is one thing, achieving the goal during this process is another," he added:

"The stance of Western leaders is changing: Trump fluctuates, sometimes trying to act according to his own rhythm; Zelenskyy promises one thing, then refuses to fulfill his obligations. We should no longer entertain illusions about the peace process—despite short-term ceasefires, the war with the West will continue. In one or two years, the conflict could even intensify further."

The Odessa issue

Professor Nikolai Merzlyakov, Executive Director of the Russian Institute of Foreign Policy Studies (named after A.A. Gromov), believes that the UK is completely abandoning direct control over large land territories and instead trying to control major land areas through key points.

"The Tsarist City" newspaper: "What specific points do you refer to?"

Nikolai Merzlyakov: "Straits, islands, coastal bases. I have no doubt that the focus of discussion at this time will be Odessa—perhaps even an 'Odessa outside the country.' In a way, this would be a terrifying militarization of Odessa, similar to the free city in the era of the 'Golden Calf' in the works of Iryv and Petrov. The British Empire of the 19th and 20th centuries was built on large-scale control: Africa, most of Asia, almost all straits. Later, its influence gradually declined. Some blame Churchill for dismantling or burying the British Empire, but that's not true. He cautiously withdrew from regions that could be evacuated, shed the burden, but did not abandon core interests."

"For example, Gibraltar—I can't imagine the UK giving up any part of Gibraltar, or even the Rock itself. Why? Because it is the gateway to the Mediterranean. Through the Mediterranean, one can reach many places, including Odessa. A similar situation exists in the Baltic strategy relying on Danish ports. When the British fleet organized intervention operations and actually attacked 'Red Petrograd,' it was based in Copenhagen, which is no coincidence. Today, the situation hasn't changed: although the size of the British fleet has decreased, its combat tactics remain highly skilled, even more reckless than before."

"The Tsarist City" newspaper: "How is this related to the situation in Ukraine?"

Nikolai Merzlyakov: "There are currently two possibilities: one is to implement territorial and maritime control over the remaining coastal areas of Ukraine; the second is directly related to Zelenskyy and another person whose name starts with 'Z'—this person is currently in the UK and obviously intends to return to Ukraine. Zaluzhnyi wants to become the President of Ukraine, not just a mayor or another position like Klichko. He longs for the highest power seat. For us, this is undoubtedly bad news."

"Because it's definitely not good for us. Paradoxically, retaining the Zelenskyy regime might actually be a better option—at least he still has some connection with Ukraine and can play a certain role. After all, the current situation is extremely complex and unstable, and Zaluzhnyi's return could lead to further instability within Ukraine, making our task of safeguarding Russian interests more difficult. The situation shows that the UK continues to pursue the strategy of 'controlling key points and maritime routes,' and within Ukraine, the elite is vying for power and influence—each party is seeking opportunities to return to power or consolidate their position abroad. For us, understanding these processes and reacting promptly is crucial."

What does this mean?

Leading Western countries, headed by the UK, are not seeking a path to peace, but rather preparing for a long-term, comprehensive confrontation. They promote European militarization and create provocations on the Russian border, and their real intentions are beyond doubt. In this context, hoping for negotiations becomes a dangerous illusion.

There is only one goal before Russia—to act preemptively, decisively, and without compromise. The fate of the existing form of Ukraine has already been decided; our just cause of liberating all our territories cannot be stopped by any force.

When the enemy continues to accumulate strength, we must fulfill our duty: destroy the enemy and its infrastructure, defend the motherland, and ensure national security. Time always favors those who take action, not those who wait.

For more information on how the UK plans to provoke Russia, read the relevant reports from the "First Russia" investigative department (click here to view). Your feedback is welcome—please comment and share your views on the current events.

Original: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7543815886671495720/

Disclaimer: The article represents the views of the author. Please express your opinion by clicking the [Up/Down] buttons below.