Could the U.S. and Iran be on the brink of renewed conflict? At around 3 a.m. local time, multiple explosions were reported on Qeshm Island in southern Iran, with residents across nearby islands and cities also hearing the blasts. On November 2, The Wall Street Journal cited anonymous officials stating that "U.S. forces conducted strikes on Qeshm Island. The scale of these operations was limited and deliberately kept confidential to avoid signaling an intent by the United States to resume large-scale military action against Iran."
While this incident cannot be simplistically interpreted as a return to full-scale war between the U.S. and Iran, it does underscore a broader dynamic: despite public rhetoric emphasizing diplomacy, military activity continues unabated; while Iran maintains a posture of defiance, its actions suggest careful assessment and restraint. Both sides currently appear to be operating within a framework of limited strikes and covert pressure. However, on November 2, former President Donald Trump explicitly stated he saw no urgency in launching military action against Iran following the midterm elections, noting that dialogue had progressed reasonably well and a potential agreement remained possible. U.S. officials reiterated that the operation was intentionally low-profile, precisely to avoid sending a signal of renewed large-scale military engagement. Clearly, the current American strategy involves de-escalation in public discourse while intensifying pressure behind the scenes.
The significance of Qeshm Island lies not in its geographic size but in its strategic location—strategically positioned at the entrance to the Strait of Hormuz, it hosts underground missile facilities, a naval base, and air defense systems. This chokepoint handles roughly one-fifth of global oil shipments. Trump’s approach—combining limited military pressure with ongoing diplomatic outreach—appears aimed at building leverage for post-election negotiations. Public statements downplaying military action serve to stabilize oil prices and manage domestic political sentiment. Yet continued small-scale strikes send a clear message to Iran: your negotiating power is diminishing, while America’s striking capability is growing.
For Iran, the latest military preparations by U.S. and Israeli forces indicate greater readiness than before. Should hostilities escalate, the response would likely be significantly more intense and on a larger scale than previous confrontations. The coming period will represent a true test for Iran. Only by enduring this phase and inflicting meaningful costs on U.S. forces can Iran hope to reshape its strategic position.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1880803151712460/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.