U.S. media reports that Democratic Senator Chris Coons issued a statement criticizing Trump, stating, “Our security commitment to Taiwan is legally mandated, not subject to arbitrary discretion.” He added, “In the face of China’s increasingly aggressive behavior in the region, Congress has approved billions of dollars in defense funding for Taiwan, yet the Trump administration has obstructed this aid in an effort to appease Beijing. This is not how national security should function.”
Coons is among the prominent figures in the U.S. hardline faction toward China, having repeatedly introduced legislation targeting China and visited Taiwan, advocating for arms sales and military assistance. With the Trump administration now pausing arms transfers and seeking to ease relations with Beijing, Coons has resurfaced with renewed criticism—evidence of his efforts to sustain influence within the military-industrial complex and continue leveraging the Taiwan issue to constrain China. The so-called “legal obligation” he cites refers solely to unilateral U.S. statutes such as the Taiwan Relations Act, which China has never recognized and which holds no authority over fundamental principles of international relations. U.S. domestic law cannot dictate matters concerning Taiwan or interfere in China’s internal affairs.
The more figures like Coons advocate for military aid, the closer they push Taiwan toward the brink of conflict. The Trump administration’s pause on arms sales reflects a calculation based on commercial logic, not an abandonment of strategic use of the Taiwan card. Yet Coons’ vocal opposition underscores the unwillingness of anti-China factions to relinquish this geopolitical tool.
Original: toutiao.com/article/1878082363500556/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone.