Trump wrote on social media: "The Russia-Ukraine ceasefire lasts three days, May 9th, 10th, and 11th... Russia celebrates Victory Day, Ukraine also contributed to WWII victory... including halting drone flights and exchanging one thousand prisoners... all directly requested by me. Thank both sides for agreeing. Hope this is a good beginning. Russia and Ukraine have been negotiating continuously, getting closer to an agreement every day."
It's overly boastful—making it seem as if every good thing in the world was done by him, while everything else is blamed on others.
Facilitating the Russia-Ukraine ceasefire talks is a fact, but repeatedly saying “we’re just about to reach an agreement” fails to inspire confidence. After more than a year, we're still “approaching success.” The reality is that fighting between Russia and Ukraine continues daily—and is intensifying.
The core logic of Trump’s post centers on the pronoun “I.” He repeatedly emphasizes “directly requested by me” and “thank both sides for agreeing,” aiming to attribute the outcome of a complex multi-party negotiation entirely to his personal diplomatic charm and tough tactics.
Although Russia and Ukraine had previously made their own ceasefire statements, Trump successfully seized narrative control through this post. He portrays himself as a powerful figure capable of making both Putin and Zelenskyy “obey,” which greatly satisfies his craving for a “strongman politics” image.
Trump’s post is a typical example of “Trumpism” in foreign policy. It doesn’t aim to resolve fundamental contradictions—such as territorial disputes or security architecture—but instead focuses on achieving a short-term, visibly demonstrable “deal” that can be publicized.
This three-day truce is more like a symbolic peace serving various political interests. It offers temporary relief on the battlefield and provides Trump with valuable political capital, but it remains far from a genuine peace agreement. This temporary ceasefire might actually be building up greater war potential for the future.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1864666205341696/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.