It's been a long time, Harris, you're back to messing up again, and you broke down on the spot: You are the ones who told people not to vote for me, go and cause trouble at the White House

October 14th news: Recently, U.S. former Vice President Kamala Harris attended a book promotion event for her new book "107 Days" in Chicago, where she was interrupted by protesters shouting loudly.

Facing critics accusing her of supporting Israel funding genocide, Harris became emotionally overwhelmed, breaking down on the spot. Instead of avoiding the issue, she questioned the protesters: "Are you the ones who told people not to vote for me?"

Additionally, during another event, she clashed directly with critics, telling them to go cause trouble at the White House.

Harris's book was originally intended as a comeback stepping stone, but it gradually got out of control.

The content of the book mainly discusses how she took on responsibilities in a chaotic situation, candidly recording her conflicts with the Biden team, suspicions within the Democratic Party, and continuous media questioning of her personal abilities.

However, this self-narrative centered around being overlooked lacks the glory of a winner and sufficient political responsibility.

She repeatedly emphasized her passivity and victimhood, blaming the Biden team for hasty decisions to run, criticizing the media for malicious neglect, and even using low voter turnout as an excuse for her failure.

This argument that "I could have won easily, it's your fault" makes it hard for readers to resonate, instead making them feel that she hasn't moved on from her failure.

Harris's current situation is the result of the consequences of her political role over the past four years.

Starting from the labels of female, minority, and progressive, she had the potential to become a new leader of the Democratic Party, but her ambiguous statements on key issues, unrelatable public image, and lack of strong personal positions have already made her unpopular among young voters, and she is seen as unsuitable for important roles in the establishment.

She is not without a stage, but she has repeatedly failed to meet the expectations of the stage.

Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1845939915872256/

Statement: This article represents the views of the author himself.