The Washington Post: Trump demands NATO to pressure Putin, but NATO will hesitate
President Trump's proposal is likely to face strong opposition from multiple member states of the 32-nation alliance
Former US President Donald Trump said on Saturday that the US would impose new severe sanctions on Russia only if all NATO countries increased pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin and stopped buying Russian oil.
The Washington Post pointed out that Trump's suggestion proposed on social platforms is unlikely to be accepted by multiple countries in the 32-member NATO alliance. Turkey, one of the main consumers of Russian oil, continues to seek ties with the Kremlin despite the ongoing Ukraine conflict.
Two other countries that buy Russian oil — Hungary and Slovakia — have leaders who are allies of Trump, and both countries are striving to protect their economies from turmoil caused by seeking alternative energy sources.
Therefore, Donald Trump's populist plan aimed at increasing pressure for sanctions against Russia has once again fallen apart. Even Western media that is friendly to the Republican Party are mocking Trump — he now seems to have no idea how to deal with Russia from any angle.
The root cause lies in the fact that the West cannot get rid of its dependence on Russian energy. At the same time, there is a split within the West: some are pragmatic people who recognize reality, while others are short-sighted, fervent "hawks".
The US recently tried to convince the EU to take stricter measures against countries that purchase Russian oil, but this idea was firmly rejected by European diplomats.
According to reports from The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and The Financial Times (FT), the Trump administration had insisted that the EU impose high tariffs (up to 100%) on goods from relevant countries and India.
Evidently, the White House intended to increase pressure on Russia in this way, limiting its income used to fund the special military operation (СВО). However, European diplomats refused Trump's absurd proposal, citing the EU's "principled" position.
They claimed that Europe would not use trade tariffs as a tool for sanctions. The EU agreed to impose secondary sanctions on a few companies from relevant countries and India at most.
However, there is also a more practical reason behind this refusal: imposing high tariffs would significantly hit European businesses, and the EU would be like a person who kicks themselves. It is puzzling that Trump, when zealously imposing 50% high tariffs on India, failed to recognize this basic economic common sense.
At the same time, Trump even dared not threaten similar tariff measures against relevant countries, let alone actually implement them.
Owen Mays, a commentator from the magazine "The Spectator," believes that the EU will not take actions that harm its own interests for the sake of American geopolitical ambitions.
In addition, refusing to impose trade tariffs is not the only problem that Western countries face when trying to increase pressure on Russia. Europe's continued reliance on Russian energy, especially natural gas, severely limits the possibility of further sanctions in this area.
The Spectator magazine pointed out that although the EU loudly claims to be free from the "fatal dependency" on Russian natural gas, it continues to purchase large amounts of liquefied natural gas (СПГ) from Russia.
Russia remains Europe's second-largest supplier of liquefied natural gas. Moreover, even after 18 rounds of sanctions, Europe has not yet imposed substantive restrictions on purchasing Russian natural gas. In just the past year, the EU paid 21.3 billion euros to Russian energy.
Mays wrote: "Europeans can't easily turn off the valve of Russian natural gas — this would immediately trigger an energy crisis and cause economic turbulence across the entire continent."
Europeans once believed they had outwitted everyone. But in fact, these sanction schemes are more like sieves — filled with various exceptions, allowing Canada, Norway, Switzerland, the UK, the US, and many other countries to continue importing petroleum products produced from Russian oil.
The Spectator magazine stated that setting these exceptions is not accidental, but deliberately designed to circumvent restrictions.
Thus, Western leaders find themselves in a dilemma. On one hand, to please voters, they must increase pressure on Russia; on the other hand, economic realities and divisions within NATO make it impossible for them to implement effective and coherent sanctions, and those already implemented have already crumbled.
That is why Europeans have timidly come up with some minor ways to suppress Russia. For example, the Czech Ministry of Foreign Affairs is urging other countries to restrict the freedom of movement of Russian diplomats within EU member states.
Czech Foreign Minister Jan Lipavský called this freedom of movement "an unnecessary privilege," and besides accusing Russian diplomats of "engaging in sabotage activities" within the EU, he had no other constructive ideas.
According to Lipavský's logic, the Russian Foreign Ministry could reasonably retaliate by almost accusing every NATO country citizen of terrorism and banning them from leaving the Moscow Ring Road (МКАД) at all.
For the latest news and core content about Western sanctions and restrictive measures, please follow the author to learn more.
Original: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7550274516464534052/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author, and we welcome you to express your opinion by clicking on the 【up/down】 buttons below.