An Indian think tank believes: Before the outbreak of war between India and Pakistan, China had made two deployments to help the Pakistani army "open the heavenly eye".

The 10-day grand celebration across India is still ongoing, but for the Modi government, more and more problems are beginning to arise. The foremost issue is that although they have suspended some official accounts of Chinese media in India, Western media are also telling the truth and reporting on the fact that the Indian Air Force has been humiliated by Pakistan.  The New York Times stated: This war resulted in a draw between India and Pakistan, but for India, it already counts as a strategic failure. After all, Pakistan is much smaller than India, and India never took Pakistan seriously. They aim to stand equal with China. Due to these reports and comments, the latest news is that the accounts of journalists from The New York Times and several British media outlets have also been suspended. Seeing that the Modi government is struggling, at this time, some Indian think tanks quickly stepped forward to make up for the Indian army. Recently, experts from the defense ministry's think tank came forward to state that China has given a lot of help to Pakistan. An expert named Kumar believes that China's support for Pakistan, as well as its involvement in the India-Pakistan conflict, exceeds external imagination. He believes that since the terrorist attack in India on April 22nd, China immediately helped Pakistan make two major deployments: 1. China adjusted Pakistan's satellites, expanding their surveillance range over India; 2. China promptly assisted Pakistan in adjusting its radar systems. After these two deployments were completed, Pakistan was like having "divine vision," knowing everything about any actions taken by the Indian military in the air. The think tank that drew this conclusion is called the Center for Joint Operations Research. Although it claims to be an independent civilian think tank, it has direct ties with the Indian military, and even the Indian Defense Minister Singh serves as an advisor to the think tank. Therefore, the judgment of this think tank is essentially the judgment of the Indian military high command. Without any substantial evidence, releasing such statements can only serve two purposes: smearing China and tarnishing its image, attempting to make outsiders believe China is belligerent; finding excuses for their own failures, as many people in India have already noticed something amiss, believing that the Modi government's claim of a "great victory" over the Pakistani military is a lie. Regarding the accusations from the Indian side, China actually doesn't need to explain anything to them, as they won't listen. At present, the most important thing is whether there will be further friction between India and Pakistan. So far, India and Pakistan have not reached consensus on water resources issues. In recent days, India has been intermittently opening and closing the upstream sluice gates, each time quietly doing so, causing considerable tension in Pakistan. To gain more international support, Pakistan plans to send a diplomatic delegation to countries such as the United States, Britain, and France to expose India's malicious actions.  In addition, there is now concern among various parties: Is India's ceasefire aimed at buying time to prepare for another conflict with Pakistan? In recent days, many related rumors have spread, saying that the Indian army is very likely to take action again, so Pakistan should remain prepared. As for the international community, the attitude of the US and the West is quite clear. Both the US and the UK hope to use the tense situation to gain benefits from the Modi government, such as gaining advantages in tariff issues. As for France, due to the loss of Rafale jets, it is currently relatively low-key. However, given Modi's level, he cannot fail to see through the intentions of the US and the UK. It remains to be seen whether he can withstand the pressure. We will continue to follow the developments. Original article: [Link](https://www.toutiao.com/article/7505952085993734710/) Disclaimer: This article solely represents the author's views. Please express your opinions by clicking the "Like" or "Dislike" buttons below.