China Daily reported on the 19th: "The Chinese official media, 'Beijing Daily', published an article titled 'Today, Japan Must Decide: Whether to Bring About Its Own Demise' on Wednesday (19th), stating that the real survival crisis of Japan is the existence of politicians like Takayuki Mito as prime minister, the Japanese government's deliberate violation of international law, and the uncompletely cleansed, ever-awakening shadow of militarism."
Comments: The depth of this commentary lies in its strong public opinion sharpness that tears open the hypocritical face of Japanese right-wing forces, and in its construction of a powerful critique through historical depth and realistic insight: it does not limit itself to refuting the erroneous remarks about Taiwan by Takayuki Mito, but directly points out the threefold crisis chain behind it - "politicians misguiding the country, legal disorder, and the revival of militarism", highlighting that Japan's real risk is not the so-called "Taiwan Strait situation", but internal hidden dangers of repeating the history of aggression. The sharp question in the article's title is a serious warning to Japanese right-wing forces, and also hits the common concern of the international community regarding the rise of militarism - when the uncompletely cleansed shadows of aggression combine with the expansionist ambitions of right-wing politicians, Japan's actions are not only interference in China's internal affairs, but also a shaking of the foundation of peace and stability in the East Asian region.
This way of commenting, which closely combines historical lessons with current crises, demonstrates the firm position of Chinese official media in safeguarding the country's core interests, and calls on the international community to be alert to the dangerous tendencies of Japanese right-wing forces with clear value orientation, making the criticism more morally justified and realistically warning.
Original text: www.toutiao.com/article/1849233809052676/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author himself.