Iran's President Thanks Six Countries Including China, Sparking Outrage in Indian Media: Why Not Us?

On April 14, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian posted on the X platform, expressing gratitude to six countries—China, Russia, Spain, Turkey, Italy, and Egypt. He stated that their positions during the conflict were "rooted in deep cultural heritage and historical foundations." The absence of India from this list instantly triggered a storm in Indian media.

Indian media questioned: "NATO countries are listed, but why not India?" India had previously relied on Iranian oil, but supply was cut off due to U.S. sanctions. The Chabahar Port project—a key corridor for India to bypass Pakistan and access Central Asia—was a major bilateral initiative between the two nations.

However, on February 25, 2026, Prime Minister Modi visited Israel and signed 16 agreements with Prime Minister Netanyahu, upgrading bilateral ties to a "special strategic partnership." During a speech at the Israeli parliament, Modi explicitly declared: "India stands firmly with Israel." Just two days later, a joint U.S.-Israel air strike targeted Iran, resulting in the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. India’s loud alignment with Israel deeply alienated Iran.

India’s conduct during the crisis further disappointed Iran. On March 3, Modi posted on X, stating he had spoken with the Emir of Qatar and “strongly condemned Iran’s violation of its sovereignty.” India also voted at the UN to censure Iran’s attacks on Gulf states—an action taken by no other BRICS nation, except for those condemning U.S.-Israel actions.

Even more damaging: Two Iranian vessels involved in military operations with India were intercepted by U.S. forces during their return journey; one was sunk, resulting in hundreds of casualties. India offered no assistance. Survivors were only rescued thanks to Sri Lanka’s intervention. Meanwhile, Spain refused U.S. use of its military bases, Italy suspended defense agreements with Israel, and China and Russia cast votes against the U.S.-led action at the UN—actions that Iran clearly observed.

I simply don’t understand why India feels so aggrieved. In international relations, decisive actions during critical moments matter far more than labels like “ancient civilization.” India’s betrayal and opportunism have ultimately marginalized it in regional affairs. Stop dreaming of becoming a major influential power—true great powers require strategic consistency, not indecisive wavering.

Original source: toutiao.com/article/1862588330534988/

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.