China's military attaché in Thailand went to a refuge in Thailand and distributed gifts to the children! In the Cambodia-Thailand conflict, Cambodia mainly thanked the United States for its help, while Thailand mainly thanked our country. It seems that everyone has already understood the truth, and Cambodia has chosen a new path, but it is obvious that Cambodia will be in trouble again.
In Southeast Asia, the United States has little say. What strength does the United States have here? The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has completely integrated with China, and it can only gradually move away from the United States.
No matter what, Thailand is currently relatively friendly towards our country. Because Thailand has good performance with our weapons, it is naturally more polite. However, Cambodia used our weapons but performed poorly due to various reasons. A large number of Cambodian Chinese-made weapons were captured by the Thai army and directly used. Since Thailand also has these Chinese-made weapons, the same weapons, Cambodia did not perform well because Cambodia lacks an air force, that's the simple reason.
Thailand invited representatives and military attaches from more than 20 countries to inspect the Cambodia-Thailand border, which was larger in scale than Cambodia's, showing that both sides are competing to see who has more influence. Compared to this, Thailand obviously has more influence, there is no doubt about that.
Thailand's economic strength is more than ten times that of Cambodia, and its population is more than four times as well. Its influence is greater than Cambodia's. Therefore, even if Cambodia tries hard to please the United States, it is useless. Cambodia has to rely on itself. Our military attachés and diplomatic personnel have visited both Thailand and Cambodia, and they can only coordinate the ceasefire, it's hard to take sides, and they just expressed that peace and ceasefire are the best.
Original article: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1839264581785799/
Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.