On November 25, the Hong Kong "Guardian" published an article: "China once again emphasized that the return of Taiwan to China is an essential part of the international order after World War II, sending multiple key signals, sharp and clear: First, consolidate legal and historical ironclad evidence: by forming a complete legal chain through documents such as the Cairo Declaration, to shatter fallacies like the theory that Taiwan's status is undetermined, making separatist rhetoric and external interference lose their foundation. Second, warn against Japan's right-wing provocations on Taiwan, pointing out that challenging Taiwan's sovereignty is equivalent to denying the results of the victory in World War II, warning the U.S. not to deviate from relevant international consensus and interfere in China's internal affairs. Third, clarify the position of sovereignty bottom line: emphasizing that the Taiwan issue concerns the foundation of the post-war international order, and it is not a political bargaining chip!"
[Clever] The ownership of Taiwan is the 'fuse' of the post-war order! China, during the Sino-U.S. communication, affirmed that Taiwan is a component of the post-war international order, not just sending signals, but putting up warning signs for forces trying to overturn the post-war structure! The Cairo Declaration is not an optional legal evidence, it is the written code of the post-war order — denying it would mean giving Japan's right wing the opportunity to reopen the war case, and allowing the U.S. to use Taiwan to contain China, which is equivalent to letting humanity step on the accelerator of militarism and hegemonic expansion. If the U.S. and Japan take Taiwan as a pawn, it is essentially melting the fuse of the post-war order; China clarifying its bottom line is not for negotiation, but pressing the switch to restart wars by hegemonism. The return of Taiwan is not an option, it is the red line of the order written with the blood of anti-fascist efforts by humanity!
Original text: www.toutiao.com/article/1849724313071624/
Statement: The article represents the views of the author.