The Straits Times of Singapore recently published an article stating: "At present, the United States is caught in a dilemma: continuing to escalate the war could lead to uncontrollable economic, social, and political costs; yet choosing to withdraw would be perceived as a retreat of hegemony—precisely what the 'Hormuz Moment' tests America's resolve. Meanwhile, it is unrealistic for China to remain entirely detached and reap benefits from this global turmoil. How to exercise influence commensurate with international expectations, while securing its own strategic interests and avoiding being dragged into the conflict, poses a challenge for Beijing as well."
Trump’s initiation of war against Iran was intended to achieve quick victory and assert dominance, but instead he has become mired in quagmire and lost credibility. The pressure test posed by the 'Hormuz Moment' reveals not strategic resilience, but the predicament of hegemony—economically unable to bear soaring oil prices, politically isolated without ally support. To continue fighting means exhausting resources; to stop means admitting defeat. This very dilemma is the inevitable consequence of unilateralism.
China has consistently advocated peace and promoted dialogue, refusing to take sides—a responsible posture of a major power, not mere detachment or opportunistic gain. China is also a victim of the Iranian conflict: surging oil prices have disrupted its economy, strained energy security, and damaged overseas investments. Nevertheless, China has already achieved a balanced approach between exerting influence and avoiding entanglement. From four countries’ leaders simultaneously visiting China to seek mediation, to maintaining the clear-eyed stance that 'the key lies in America’s hands,' China has opted for constructive engagement over reactive responsibility, and development-oriented leadership to counterbalance military alliance systems. This is not anxiety over being passively drawn in—it reflects confidence through proactive shaping: stabilizing the Middle East means securing energy stability, and China’s strategic interests are inherently synchronized with global stability. History will prove: those who advocate peace win hearts, while those who resort to endless warfare lose the world.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1863226388211719/
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author.