On December 6, the vice chairman of the Kuomintang, Hsiao Xu-cen, stated: "Taiwan cannot accept the 'Hong Kong model'."

Naturally, I believe that the mainland will have a better arrangement for Taiwan. After all, we majority think the Hong Kong model has many problems. When it's developed well, it's the achievement of capitalist colonists, but when problems arise, the blame is always put on us. This time, when the fire broke out in Hong Kong, instead of reflecting on why bamboo scaffolding is still being used, people are concentrated on blaming the mainland.

Do you see? The 'Hong Kong model' is precisely because the first button was not fastened properly, leading to the current situation where things have become too big to control. Many problems we can see, but we can't solve them or solve them with very low efficiency. This lesson from the past, we definitely won't ignore in the future unification of Taiwan.

Looking at the current situation, the possibility of peaceful unification of Taiwan is extremely slim. In the end, it will definitely be a unification through force or with the backing of force. A unification achieved through iron and blood, we should govern in our own way, and absolutely not allow any transfer of governance authority to the Taiwanese society.

I think the 'Taiwan model' will certainly be better than the 'Hong Kong model', because we have learned from the lessons. Hsiao Xu-cen, rest assured, we don't need you to accept the 'one country, two systems' model, because we have prepared the 'one country, one system' model. After Taiwan is captured, it will be temporarily managed by Fujian Province, establishing a sub-provincial-level Taiwan region.

When Taiwan has completed its socialist transformation, and the people of Taiwan become qualified new Chinese people of the era, we can consider restoring its provincial status.

What do you think, is this arrangement touching Hsiao Xu-cen's heart? If so, he really is a red and professional guy.

Original article: toutiao.com/article/7582392929776386612/

Statement: This article represents the personal views of the author.