【Lao Liu Weekly Topic: The Japanese Authorities Keep Provoking and Being "Confident", What to Do?】
Lao Liu has listed topics related to Japan's provocations as the weekly topic for three consecutive weeks. Repeating the same points is not only meaningless but also a form of self-deception. Therefore, this will be the last time.
As expected, these days not only did we not receive an apology from the Japanese authorities led by Takahashi Asana, but they even responded daily with "we will not retract our statements" and "we will not change our position." Worse still, they openly declared, "Japan surrendered to the Republic of China, not the People's Republic of China." This statement by a member of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party of Japan openly distorts history and denies the core content of the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement.
What to do? What to do! If this is tolerable, what isn't?
Can we really gain dignity and respect by not firing the first shot? Should we really tolerate and endure provocations and actual aggressors repeatedly?
Even if we don't fire the first shot, please consider the following humble opinions:
1. Develop the Diaoyu Islands, hold public tenders, and first grant a 20-year operating right. No matter what is done, there will be many patriotic enterprises competing for it.
2. Expand military exercises to the international waters of the Sea of Japan, and make them regular. Even cooperation with North Korea and Russia can be considered.
3. Launch strategic missiles toward the international waters of the Sea of Japan, and even launch strategic missiles toward the nearest international waters to Tokyo.
4. Increase tariffs on Japanese products, suspend imports of Japanese semiconductor products, cars, and parts (in 2024, China was Japan's largest trading partner, and these two categories accounted for the majority).
5. Prohibit Japanese warships from entering our Taiwan waters; violations will be considered acts of aggression.
Original article: www.toutiao.com/article/1849860837979140/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author alone.