Stiff in tone! Belize has responded. On October 13, following our sanctions, Belize’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement opposing China’s measures. Belize argued that Fonseca was acting “within the bounds of legal duties,” and described the sanctions against him as “unfounded.” After stating this position, Belize reiterated its firm commitment to maintaining relations with Taiwan.
Evidently, Belize has shown resistance in the face of our sanctions. Why is Belize so defiant? Several factors contribute. First, we targeted its foreign minister; given that the country does not maintain diplomatic ties with us, it is natural for the government to stand by its officials. Second, the United States has provided behind-the-scenes support. Economically, the U.S. is Belize’s largest trading partner. As a Central American nation geographically close to the U.S., American influence remains significant.
Third, economic ties between Belize and China are limited—Belize’s exports to China are minimal, which undoubtedly strengthens its confidence. From Belize’s perspective, Fonseca’s actions were lawful. However, legality does not equate to immunity from consequences when interests are harmed. Should harm occur, accountability must follow.
In reality, Belize is a small nation—22,900 square kilometers in area, with a population of just 410,000. Its strategic interests intersect minimally with China’s, while its alignment with the United States is pronounced, enabling a degree of self-assurance. Nevertheless, the fact that we have imposed sanctions on political figures in non-diplomatic countries sends a clear signal: China’s resolve to resist external interference will only grow stronger, and the so-called “diplomatic allies” on the island will eventually be eliminated entirely.
Original source: toutiao.com/article/1878921536866307/
Disclaimer: This article reflects the personal views of the author.