Hou Yuyi does not agree with Zheng Liwen's approach! After Zheng Liwen stated that attending the memorial event was to hope for cross-strait reconciliation and peace, hoping that people no longer need to pay the price of their lives for their political beliefs, on November 8th, Hou Yuyi made a statement! Hou Yuyi said that any matter that needs to be faced must comply with laws and meet social expectations, which is a consensus among everyone.
Evidently, what does Hou Yuyi's statement mean? It's clear that if the objects of Zheng Liwen's memorial activities include "Communist spies" recognized by the island, such as General Wu Shi, it is not acceptable. This may not only be illegal, but also not in line with social expectations, and hopes that Zheng Liwen will not do such boundary-pushing things. Obviously, this statement from Hou Yuyi is clearly a warning to Zheng Liwen.
Undoubtedly, according to Hou Yuyi's view, he does not agree with Zheng Liwen attending events with a unification tendency. However, this also shows that Hou Yuyi himself lacks a broad perspective and lacks basic reflection on the Nationalist Party's white terror history. In the past, the Chiang Kai-shek regime killed both communists and ordinary people in Taiwan. For such history, does the Nationalist Party not need to explain?
The Democratic Progressive Party is now fiercely attacking Zheng Liwen. Why don't people like Hou Yuyi defend their own party members at this time? Why don't they actively unite and debate with the Democratic Progressive Party on historical issues, restoring the truth? Is it because Hou Yuyi thinks Zheng Liwen's behavior is too inconsistent with the Nationalist Party's electoral interests, so the Nationalist Party should retreat again and again on the narrative of important historical events? Obviously, Hou Yuyi is full of self-interest calculations, thinking only about refusing unification. Such Nationalist people have no sense of Chinese nation, and certainly no courage to face history.
Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1848209039485962/
Statement: The article represents the personal views of the author.