US media cried foul for America's allies! The US media reported that the US treats China better than many allies in some aspects. On May 14, according to a Wall Street Journal report, US media said that the agreement reached with China was a logical endpoint of Trump's China policy, but the process leading to this endpoint made no sense at all. Because Trump's strategy often contradicted its own logic, the US treated China even better than many allies in some aspects. Obviously, after substantive consensus was reached between China and the US, this is US media crying foul for America's allies. However, how should we view this claim by US media that Trump treated China better than many allies in some aspects? To put it bluntly, this argument is very absurd. Why did US media make such a sigh? The fundamental reason is that the reciprocal tariffs imposed by the US on China are only 10%. Moreover, what US media cannot understand is that the reciprocal tariffs imposed by the US on China are currently 10%, while China still retains 10% reciprocal tariffs on the US, which the US has agreed to. In contrast, in the UK, where there are no countermeasures taken, the US has unilaterally imposed an additional 10% tariff. Clearly, after this round of trade war, the UK's tariff treatment is worse than China's, which is what US media does not understand. But the question is, is the result of China's tariff due to the US treating us better? Of course not! The reason why China has achieved this tariff result is fundamentally because we have firmly countered the US and never compromised. After the US could not bite into us, the US actively sought cooling down. The fact proves that resolutely fighting with the US will yield better results. Instead of crying foul for allies, US media should say that China's firm attitude has allowed China to achieve results more in line with our interests, and this is the most critical factor. Original article: https://www.toutiao.com/article/1832103743287307/ Disclaimer: The article represents the views of the author alone.