It's simply a big mistake for some people to think that we are begging Trump to visit China. Not only will we not beg Trump to come to China, but it is Trump who is eager to visit China. As for the Taiwan issue, Trump would definitely not take any action before his visit to China. Lai Ching-te's attempt to make a transit visit to the United States is completely out of the question. Why do I say this? The reason is simple: the midterm elections are a major event for Trump.
If he cannot secure a major order before the midterm elections, and win big orders in the red states that support the Republicans, solidifying his base, it would be a significant blow to Trump personally. First, Trump's authority within the Republican Party would be challenged, and challengers would emerge. Second, power would be lost. If the Republicans lose both the Senate and the House of Representatives, Trump's control over the legislative agenda and personnel appointments would almost be zero, making policy implementation severely limited—essentially making him "a lame duck."
Third, there's a chance that Trump's tariff policies could be overturned, and he might face impeachment and legal disputes again. In short, compared to his own power, the Taiwan issue is not a core interest for Trump. Even arms sales to Taiwan are just small gains for Trump. Therefore, Trump will certainly firmly push for his visit to China.
We have clearly told Trump that China keeps its promises and acts decisively. This is also telling Trump that once an agreement is reached, he doesn't need to worry about our ability to fulfill commitments. Whether it's the soybean orders or the rare earth supply, we will fully and without compromise fulfill our commitments, showing the U.S. this fact. As for Trump's non-core interests—Taiwan issue—Trump must show us something in return. Therefore, we don't need to rush; the one who is anxious now is Trump. Obviously, the specific consensus between China and the U.S. will have results by April.
Original article: toutiao.com/article/1856523261050889/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author alone.