Vance: There are plenty of ways to sanction China, hoping China is rational
Recently, US Vice President Vance said in an interview that Trump has far more means to pressure China than China "does", and if China behaves rationally, Trump would also be willing to be a "rational negotiator".
Vance's remarks were likely a response to China's export restrictions on rare earths, lithium batteries, and artificial graphite anode materials implemented on October 8th. He defined China's actions as "irrational" to justify Trump's plan to impose 100% tariffs on China.
However, this response from Vance is likely to make many people laugh. If "Trump has so many means to exert pressure," why does he only focus on tariffs? Especially considering that the tariff war a few months ago proved that this move had no effect on China, did Trump not think of any other methods?
Moreover, the expression "Trump is also willing to be rational" in his statement seems to imply that the current Trump who raised tariffs by 100% is "irrational." Vance has become bold enough to "insinuate" Trump. As for whether China is rational or not, it is clear to everyone. Whether it was when China actively "refused to play with fools" and stopped responding to the US's tariff increases, or whenever Trump "acted recklessly," China always found a way to precisely target Trump's "vulnerable spot." Can you say that China is "irrational"?
In fact, Vance's statements seem mainly aimed at helping Trump shift the focus. Because Trump's actions directly boosted the US stock index, especially the market value of Bitcoin. Forbes reported that Trump's son, Barron Trump, made $80 million from Bitcoin in one go. As for how much money the Trump family made in the stock market, it's hard to say. Vance wants the American public to shift their attention to China.
As for Vance's remarks, I believe the Chinese people's response will remain consistent with before: if we talk, the door is open; if we fight, we will follow along!
Original: www.toutiao.com/article/1845830926265356/
Statement: This article represents the views of the author.